Barry wrote:By this logic, GS may wish to simplify this forum by cutting it down to two essential threads — "General Discussion" and "Radar CH".
Param-o wasn't around when the forum was created, so it is not listed separately in the description.
Barry wrote:This is why we need more exposure/promotion to PARAM-O in general.
But it is just automatic GDL coding.
Barry wrote:This is why this wish is here.
We will have to ask Laszlo.
LaszloNagy wrote:If you think about this, Laszlo, this is actually a really good idea.
By this logic, we could have dedicated Wish sections for Python, the Archicad-Grasshopper Connection, BIMcloud, Open BIM, whichever field users feel very strongly about.
Karl wrote:Karl, encouraging/informing actual forum users to comply with some obscure title construct structure is not going to work for many reasons.
I've been encouraging everyone for years (without any luck I might add!) to make their Subject lines for new threads be as meaningful as possible to help guide people to that topic.
In this case, please post your wishes (one wish per thread as always please) with a subject line that begins with "PARAM-O Wish: <the actual wish>". This will make it easy for people specifically interested in PARAM-O to find these wishes.
You run this forum and you make all the final decisions here, but if I were involved with a forum like this, I would specifically preclude any forum admin from voting on any polls. Not because we don't value your participation, but because this organized admin-voting has a potential of swaying regular user's opinions, as it is all to easy to create a situation (like the one above) where a wish was requested, and, instead of letting the other forum users build up their opinions over time, you have created and unfavourable starting environment for regular forum users to voice their opinions and created a skewed representation of that question's acceptance.