2021-03-18 05:02 PM
2021-03-19 07:04 PM
2021-03-22 02:20 AM
AC22-23 AUS 7000 | Help Those Help You - Add a Signature |
Self-taught, bend it till it breaks | Creating a Thread |
Win10 | R5 2600 | 16GB | GTX1660 |
2021-03-22 11:52 AM
2021-04-18 12:42 AM
2021-10-05 11:47 AM
I agree with Stefhannes as well. Its a very simple feature that can be implemented by pressing Ctrl or something.
2022-04-21 11:19 AM
I couldn't agree more. It would make the workflow much simpler, in my opinion, and also..more features are always a good thing! I don't see why would anyone be against it.
In my case, there's a little "trick" that usually helps me, although only in somewhat simple cases: If I want to select a number of specific elements, in an enclosed region of my drawing, instead of having to deselect the ones I don't need, I select everything in the intended region, and then with the Find & Select tool I apply a "double negative": I set the conditions to "not" and then remove from selection, thus ending with only the elements that I need. As I said, it's probably not useful for more complicated situations, but I hope somebody finds it helpful 🙂
2022-04-21 02:24 PM - edited 2022-04-21 03:38 PM
Do you mean pressing shift to add to a selection without deselecting already selected objects?? Completely agree!!! and i also was going to post a wish about this. I thought i was missing something (unfortunately i was not).
The only thing that saves it and why i dont end up missing it so much is by using a marquee in 3d along with the find command and using the "select only inside marquee" (or something like that) which works very good. But also means many aditional clicks.
This is one of those basic functionality things that would be nice to have.
2022-10-26 09:33 AM
I second this!
It's clear to me this is very much an either/or preference where both "sides" are very convinced their solution is the best. Could the control/command deselect option be a custom setting you can set in your work environment settings if you prefer it?