2009-01-22 02:48 PM
2009-09-16 10:13 PM
2009-09-17 08:50 AM
Geoff wrote:
“Look everyone, it works like it should now.”
Either way it’s essential and we should keep bugging the boys and girls at GSHQ until it’s fixed.Agree!
2009-09-17 11:01 AM
Karl wrote:I agree as well. shame I can't vote twice.Geoff wrote:
“Look everyone, it works like it should now.”![]()
![]()
Either way it’s essential and we should keep bugging the boys and girls at GSHQ until it’s fixed.Agree!
Karl
2009-09-17 08:12 PM
2009-09-17 09:04 PM
Erika wrote:That is why Graphisoft should respond to these wishes and say it will be sorted as soon as possible, or it's in the "to-do" list or it won't be happening.Karl wrote:I agree as well. shame I can't vote twice.Geoff wrote:
“Look everyone, it works like it should now.”![]()
![]()
Either way it’s essential and we should keep bugging the boys and girls at GSHQ until it’s fixed.Agree!
Karl
2009-09-24 05:59 PM
2009-09-24 07:27 PM
Shingleback wrote:Yes, if it could be programmed to deal with one segment at a time, and behave more like the normal Line Tool by starting and ending a segment with a dash, you'd be halfway there.
...at the moment a roof polygons (for example) outline has one relative line start to finish, what we require is a roof polygon to have an outline that start at one node finishes at the next and begins again at that point.
so if there were 4 sides to a polygon you would have 4 independent outlines begining and ending at the corners, assuming that the adjacent polygons have the same line type we would not have the over lapping that occurs....
2009-09-24 07:45 PM
2009-09-24 08:07 PM
2010-10-26 04:02 PM