2019-05-02 12:30 AM
2019-12-16 03:43 PM
2019-12-16 04:41 PM
2019-12-16 05:51 PM
2019-12-16 06:58 PM
2019-12-17 04:18 AM
leceta wrote:Yes, I agree, "architect friendly" is way too vague. And anyway, there are many architects who are highly technically skilled and there is a whole new generation who are not only highly technologically literate but expect technology to be progressive, expressive and most importantly supportive. GDL as it currently stands is none of those things in my mind. It is a system designed for a very small group of people with specialist knowledge that typically doesn't cross over to the realm of general visual design.
"architect friendly" it´s too vague terminology, it honestly doesn´t make any sense to me.
It would be great we could express this idea in a more concise way. There is the risk that someone is interpreting "architect friendly", as "non-techie", or even worse "someone incapable of abstract thinking"???. Our architect training its technically complex enough and a building can be as a "complex system" as any software piece of software... An architect mindset is perfectly capable of designing and algorithm.
Moreover, its becoming a commonplace the idea that anyone should start learning code ASAP, that it will become a must have skill in a few years...
So please, what does it mean "architect friendly"? Something like the new functions implemented for Complex Profile? parametric dimensions? Does it mean that archiCad needs something like "Revit families"? Well, if so, be aware that Revit families easily become complex and unmaintainable. I´m still waiting for a working alternative to coding. Grasshopper (and the like) are the best working alternative to coding, afaik.
2019-12-17 01:36 PM
Tomek wrote:Please let me know if I didn't make myself clear, and I will try to refrase.
Yes, I agree, "architect friendly" is way too vague
2020-01-14 03:12 PM
Ghaleb wrote:Hopeful, but, it still may take a couple time developing.
Hi All,
Thank you for requesting this feature, and for your active participation on the forums.
I am happy to say that we have added this into our Wish database.
As reference, the Wish number is 12574
Thank you all for sharing your ideas with us, and thank you all who voted.
Furthermore, I understand the frustration some of you are having, and I believe it is justified. I would like to encourage you all to report this to your local Support Team. The more something is requested, the higher it gets in the queue. So please feel free to always voice your opinions. We highly appreciate it!
[Stay Active. Stay Awesome ]
Kind regards,
Ghaleb
2020-01-17 04:53 AM
Ghaleb wrote:Is there some way to check in on the progress of the wish? Or is the wishing bucket locked up somewhere in a basement where nobody ever looks?
Hi All,
Thank you for requesting this feature, and for your active participation on the forums.
I am happy to say that we have added this into our Wish database.
As reference, the Wish number is 12574
2020-01-17 07:53 PM
Tomek wrote:
It would be awesome if Graphisoft had a more transparent development process with a public road map of planned features. I think this would go a long way to making a lot of people happy.
2020-01-17 09:57 PM
Tomek wrote:True that.
It would be awesome if Graphisoft had a more transparent development process with a public road map of planned features. I think this would go a long way to making a lot of people happy.