2005-11-27 01:10 PM
2005-11-27 01:46 PM
hampden wrote:You will be pleased to know if do put the key with this dialogue open, the display goes away.
7. little request: the the protection key not found dialogue when launching archicad should give you the option of putting a key in rather than only quit or demo mode.
Stefan Hampden
2005-11-27 02:21 PM
toolbars and pallets are confusing, not sure I understand what the difference iscould you be more specific?
Sorry these suggestions span a couple of categories but just wanted to get them all out I'm currently using AC 9.0 on a mac:it's fine that you apologised but how are we supposed to vote now? Some of your wishes are already implemented, I do not agree with some of them.... next time hold your horses, slow down and post it one by one.
2005-11-28 07:15 AM
hampden wrote:
2. allow tab to maneuver to different edit fields in the parameters and custom settings fields of the settings dialogue boxes (especially necessary as gdl objects gain more and more parameters.
2006-01-16 06:00 PM
hampden wrote:This is what you use your Views for - they have four settings, the first one of which is Layer Combination.
5. allow for different layer settings in different windows. It seems rather inefficient at times, when traversing between a plan and a section/elevation, to have to switch layers each time the focus changes from window to window . I understand that sometimes one wants the layers to be consistent between all windows, however for most work it seems there should be some mechanism to override this on a window by window basis (maybe a toggle at the bottom left with the other window centric controls?).
2006-01-16 06:51 PM
Bruce wrote:Yes, but if you are in a Section window, then go to your Floor Plan view (likely with different layer combination), when you go back to Section it has to rebuild, even if you haven't changed anything. Slightly annoying.
This is what you use your Views for - they have four settings, the first one of which is Layer Combination.
2006-01-16 07:00 PM
2006-06-28 11:56 AM
2006-06-28 02:14 PM
Bruce wrote:Bruce,
If you change your section/elevation to Manual rebuild you can postpone this and choose to rebuild when you want. Does this help?
2006-06-28 02:17 PM
s2art wrote:Exactly! and it's not such a big deal if you just switch between views and work only in that view, when coordinating a set I often end up switching between views frequently, and there is a real lack of fluidity when you have to wait for things to regenerate or have the wrong layers applied to the drawing you are moving to.Bruce wrote:Yes, but if you are in a Section window, then go to your Floor Plan view (likely with different layer combination), when you go back to Section it has to rebuild, even if you haven't changed anything. Slightly annoying.
This is what you use your Views for - they have four settings, the first one of which is Layer Combination.
2006-06-28 02:27 PM
2006-06-28 03:08 PM
Rob wrote:Won't happen again, thanks for the feedback.
1.You can adjust the auto-update delay in Work Environment-->Dialog Boxes & Palettes Tab -->auto-update delay (in seconds) - that could solve you problem.THANK-YOU THANK-YOU THANK-YOU THANK-YOU THANK-YOU !
can't believe i never found that, it was driving everyone in our office bonkers!
Rob wrote:
6. mate, how would you solve sharing violation problems? like if you clicked on the same wall as your team mate and tried to modified that at the same time.i would prefer that one had the option to risk having an edit or item disappear if two people were working on the same element, than have the rigidity of the current system. as for the technical / bandwidth issue, the program could just check every x number of mouse clicks for changes, or x number of seconds / minutes. i'm not looking to see someone else stretch a wall in real time on my machine, i would be tickled if the teamwork functionality was just less of an impediment to getting multiple people to work on the project
your suggested approach would require being on-line (team mate-server-team mate) all the time which would require extreme networking data-flow bandwidth, so basically you would be waiting for updates 90% of your time there (assuming that you're using standard networking, unless you live in the comp lab somewhere in Silicon Valley)
we are a small group working in a studio space and can talk to one another. as often as not we find ourselves saying, "you know i could use the help, but it's just going to be to much of a pain since i need access to a little of everything." like i said in my original post, i can see the value of the current system in big offices, however since archicad puts all the drawings into one file by its nature (mostly a very good thing) anything which keeps multiple folks for accessing the information fluidly becomes a big impediment to productivity.
it is just very cumbersome (IMHO) to constantly be dealing with workspace issues when i can lean over my desk and tell my partner not to mess with the east bedroom. instead i have to do a sign in process which involves multiple dialogs and predetermining which layers, plans, elevations, etc i will need for the next day.
even just having full access to the drawing without having to go through the layers issues would make a big difference, signing into layers and stories seems to undermine the ability to organize by stories, since you end up needing to dump things into different layers since someone working on the other plan has the exterior wall layer (for example) signed out.
even when we get over the hurdle of deciding to share a project, i can't count the number of times, one of us needs a layer or drawing that the other has and that caucuses the both to have to go through the process again.
in any regard i don't profess to know the best way to solve this issue, i just know when drawings were on separate sheets of paper, it was easier (at this scale) to work on a set with more than one person.
Rob wrote:
sure: something like the quick layers pallet (little floating palets), will not dock with something like the coordinates toolbar (also little floating pallet like thing which can lock together and make manipulation a little easier) , even though they are a similar geometry and would make allot of sense together pallets and toolbars do not interact...i was just wondering why have two differnt classes of these objects?
over the last couple of versions archicad has had a proliferation of pallets and toolbars, and i find myself spending way to much time fidgeting with the interface (especially on the mac, i just started using the windows version and sadly i like it better). all the big graphics programs have had to grapple with interface overflow, and anything to keep all the little critters corralled, and minimize how much time i spend doing it the better. i really like the way the windows toolbars, info box, navigator, etc can be docked into the perimeter and thus the window and pallets can all be manipulated with one movement.
2006-06-28 03:24 PM
David wrote:-David,hampden wrote:
2. allow tab to maneuver to different edit fields in the parameters and custom settings fields of the settings dialogue boxes (especially necessary as gdl objects gain more and more parameters.
Stefan:
In the parameters section of the dialog box, the up and down arrow keys will highlight the previous and next parameter edit fields. The tab key works in the custom settings section of the dialog box.
HTH.
David
2006-06-28 06:33 PM
2006-06-29 05:53 AM
hampden wrote:Stefan:
the tab key does work to navigate in the custom settings dialogue, until you change a value - then it highlights the next item for a second, loses focus - as the object applies the change - and then loses track of where you were, so you have to resort to mousing back to each item you want to change.
2006-06-30 10:46 AM
David wrote:David,hampden wrote:Stefan:
the tab key does work to navigate in the custom settings dialogue, until you change a value - then it highlights the next item for a second, loses focus - as the object applies the change - and then loses track of where you were, so you have to resort to mousing back to each item you want to change.
I am not experiencing this problem on version 10. There does seems to be a longer delay in version 9 (which is what I was using when posting my original reply), but for me it works as I described, so I don't know what the issue is on your setup. Sorry I can't be of more help.
David