2005-09-11 01:49 AM
2005-09-11 02:00 PM
firstly because it sits on the toolbox palette and takes the precious space as a basic toolu can always remove from the menu what u dont use
2005-09-11 02:10 PM
2005-09-11 06:41 PM
2005-09-11 08:39 PM
2005-09-12 01:22 AM
u can always remove from the menu what u dont usethat's not the point is it?
compared to 3ds max lights it is ages behind in development.if I wanted to talk about 3d max I would join 3dmax forum...
I have not seen any major limitations to the Light Tool at all.Honestly mate, have you ever seriously worked with it?
But, Dwight's new book explains in great detail how to get lighting to work well with LightWorks in ArchiCAD.Why do I need some extra book to find out how to cheat a basic AC tool? (I am not saying that Dwights book is not good and I will get it for sure) but in principal we should get a tool that is based on knowledge of an architect/interior designer NOT a programmer or a viz maniac.
If I knew GS had the budget of Autodesk, I'd join your wish more enthusiastically - because it would be nice to have it all. But, I feel there are more urgent things for GS to address first.I understand prioritizing of wishes but addressing this issue is nothing new especially when the lightworks engine is here and running since last year and Archilumos has partly addressed those issues already (I saw some screenshots with enhanced settings of light lib parts). I just don't understand all that fuss around...