2022-11-14 01:43 AM
Hello. Need to make a solid el. op. using extrution both up and downward. If I do on after de other, the first result just loses the opertation itself. Any ideas? Thanks!!!
Solved! Go to Solution.
2022-11-14 01:53 AM
Have you tried 'Intersection' instead of subtract up/down?
That sounds like what you are trying to achieve.
Barry.
2022-11-14 02:22 AM
Intersection will just remove any parts of the target which are not bound withing the operator.
AC22-23 AUS 7000 | Help Those Help You - Add a Signature |
Self-taught, bend it till it breaks | Creating a Thread |
Win10 | R5 2600 | 16GB | GTX1660 |
2022-11-14 02:28 AM
Maybe for the subtraction downwards you can use your typical SEO command while for the subtraction upwards maybe you want to use a roof then CTRL+0. 😎
2022-11-14 02:35 AM
Maybe @Alexandre dias can show us an image of what they are trying to achieve?
If they want to keep the upper and lower portions then a simple 'Subtract' would suffice?
I took it that they were trying to remove both the upper and lower portion which would leave you with the intersection.
Barry.
2022-11-14 05:13 AM
He wants to have the effects of both subtract with upward extrusion and subtract with downward extrusion, with a single operator (as if using the opening tool, or cutpoly; the result can get more complicated with a modeled operator, as opposed to a 2D outline). I had never noticed you can't by just doing one operation after the other.
2022-11-14 05:27 AM - edited 2022-11-14 05:28 AM
Yeah... find it odd that the two operations, subtraction with upward and subtraction with downward, are mutually exclusive...
AC22-23 AUS 7000 | Help Those Help You - Add a Signature |
Self-taught, bend it till it breaks | Creating a Thread |
Win10 | R5 2600 | 16GB | GTX1660 |
2022-11-14 06:24 AM
I am still not sure what @Alexandre dias is exactly trying to do.
With only one target and one operator, you can only apply either subtraction with upward or downward extrusion only.
You can't apply both.
You need two operators to do that.
Barry.
2022-11-14 10:46 AM
It's an interesting question? In the real world it is counter intuitive to building in that you have remove both support & suspension options. For modelling there is some logic, but in all the years of SEO being available I have never noticed it missing. The obvious questions assuming this is a "Beam" passing through an element would be:
1. Can you split the element horizontally to allow the SEO to be applied to two elements.
2. Can the element be split vertically to pull them either side of the beam.
3. As has been suggested above, does the opening tool not deliver a solution, even though it is not tied/associated with the beam?
A bit more context would help?
2023-02-27 01:46 PM