2006-07-07 04:05 PM
2006-07-09 03:53 AM
2006-07-09 08:58 PM
~/archiben wrote:I'm so glad someone feels the same way I do!
teamwork needs building into graphisoft's entire suite of applications at such a low level that it is totally transparent to the end user.
2006-07-10 12:14 AM
Eric wrote:Eric,~/archiben wrote:I'm so glad someone feels the same way I do!
teamwork needs building into graphisoft's entire suite of applications at such a low level that it is totally transparent to the end user.
2006-07-10 12:20 AM
2006-07-10 12:47 PM
~/archiben wrote:I didn't mean a totaly separated application... It's more like its own environment but totaly integrated with the graphisoft's entire suite of applications.
i think you are kinda on the right track, but not in the way you are envisaging it! teamwork does not need to be a separate 'application' for starters. teamwork needs building into graphisoft's entire suite of applications at such a low level that it is totally transparent to the end user.
~/archiben wrote:I saw all these applications, and to me they seem to be made for constructors not for architects... What I need is a simple/intuitive administrative tool to manage contacts, delegate tasks to a team work (not only design tasks), track these tasks, create automated contracts/documents (using all the BIM capabilities by linking to construction information), create simple charts/reports and accounting management. By this new approach graphisoft would use archicad just for real design activities... Let us be sincere! What's the percentage of the archicad users that uses all (I MEAN ALL) capabilities of archicad?
secondly, you need to take a look at graphisoft's 'constructor', 'estimator' and 'control' applications. (graphisoft constructor platform). they are already intended to address the wider needs of the construction industry outside of the 'architectural' arena.