2023-05-02 06:35 PM
Good Day community.
First, I'm not good at English.
I hope everyone is okay. First of all, note that this is not a typical post. I would just like to commend the graphisoft and Archicad development team who after the disastrous release of Arcicad 26 and the unimpressive 25. at least try to improve communication,
1. Improving the forum and communication platform (https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Graphisoft-Insights/Graphisoft-Community-s-new-structure/ba-p/37...)
2. after years of asking, they provided a long-term roadmap (https://aecmag.com/bim/graphisofts-new-architecture-for-architecture/)
3. And the many times requested road map (https://graphisoft.com/product-roadmap). True, there is still a lot to improve,
such as:
1. pay attention to origins (architecture/design/landscape) more seriously.
2. Add a voting system in the roadmap to understand the urgent needs of users,
3. Improve what already exists (mesh, Morph, Interactive Maps, matrix, representation options, stop taking the interesting features out of the system and make it a separate acquisition, not all of which have acquisition capabilities, basic things like render native for study, phyton environment, etc. may even be available with some limitation, because everything interesting that has been added in the last releases (pay more to have access)
4. Have more expressive and dynamic Updates, don't wait exactly for the annual releases to release features and improvements, . Many things we create based on tricks for not having dedicated and improved tools. and more (...)
5. sugest to interact more with your community, helping with questions, technical issues and greater presence in the forum. Good...
Summarizing It is evident that many things must improve, but it is also evident that we are seeing a greater effort now from graphisoft and the team, by that I mean that, we know how to criticize, but we also know how to applaud. Thanks! And excuse anything.
2023-05-03 07:38 AM
Totally agree.