License Delivery maintenance is expected to occur on Saturday, November 30, between 8 AM and 11 AM CET. This may cause a short 3-hours outage in which license-related tasks: license key upload, download, update, SSA validation, access to the license pool and Graphisoft ID authentication may not function properly. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Installation & update
About program installation and update, hardware, operating systems, setup, etc.

Loaded 2020 iMac vs 2013 Mac Pro?

Gene Kniaz
Booster
HI all!

I'm considering a new Mac purchase - can't really afford a iMac Pro or new Mac Pro, but looking at the new 2020 iMac similar to what user "Kans" has just obtained:

iMac 2020,Intel Core i9 3,6GHz 10-Core, 64Gb
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 16 GB, 1Tb SSD

or

a 2013-2019 Mac Pro as follows: Mac Pro 2.7GHZ 12-CORE 1TB SSD 128GB RAM, 2 x D700 6Gb

I think that the iMac would probably be better on a day to day basis, but the Mac Pro would be better for long stints of TwinMotion rendering? I've seen some benchmarking that suggests that you do have to load up the old Mac Pro with maxed out RAM to get the most out of its 12-core Xeon. I also think the Mac Pro will deal with the increased heat load from Twinmotion giving it a workout.

I'm currently running a 2013 era iMac with a 3.4 GHz 4 core i7 with 32Mb of RAM, and a 2Gb video card - so I'm pretty sure either machine will be a gigantic upgrade for me. As soon as I start Twinmotion on this machine, its fan goes to "11" trying to cool itself!

Thanks for any input!

GK
3 REPLIES 3
Karl Ottenstein
Moderator
As you are apparently a long-term Mac owner, you know that Apple will drop support for new operating systems on older hardware sooner or later. A loaded 2020 iMac would make more sense for a longer usable life in that regard.

As far as TwinMotion - note that you can add an external GPU (eGPU) to the iMac via a Thunderbolt port in the future if you find you need better graphics performance, including multiple GPUs. The extra heat of course will be handled by the external box at that point.

This benchmark, for example, shows very similar graphics performance with the same eGPU in both MacBook Pro 13" and the much more powerful MacBook Pro 16". As noted there, the 13" falls down on pure CPU (ARCHICAD) performance). These tests were done with a single GPU in the eGPU.
https://barefeats.com/macbook-pro-13in-vs-16in-5600m-and-egpu.html

That same site has another set of benchmarks - again of a 16" MacBook Pro which I know you're not looking at ... but the Blender benchmark includes times for an eGPU with one GPU card and another with TWO cards. The test with two cards shows half the time as one card... hence another option for TwinMotion if the iMac alone does not perform well enough for you.
https://barefeats.com/16-inch-macbook-pro-egpu-added.html
One of the forum moderators
AC 28 USA and earlier   •   macOS Sonoma 14.7.1, MacBook Pro M2 Max 12CPU/30GPU cores, 32GB
Kans
Participant
Additional 10gb ethernet for the future.
I am very happy with this machine.
AC24, iMac 2020,Intel Core i9 3,6GHz 10-Core
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 16 GB
Kans
Participant
What is your choice?
AC24, iMac 2020,Intel Core i9 3,6GHz 10-Core
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 16 GB