2007-11-14 01:42 AM - last edited on 2023-05-25 05:35 PM by Rubia Torres
2007-11-14 11:11 PM
Chazz wrote:Ah yes, another add-on. I've scripted my own handrail object for this purpose. The guardrails are another story: disaster!
I assume you are talking about handrail returns, which can be an issue. The actual stair component can certainly be made ADA compliant. To document compliance "the BIM way" I have, in the past, used StairBuilder in conjunction with CadImage's 3D Profiler for the handrails, which is sort of fun to use.
2007-11-15 12:00 AM
NONE will produce an ADA compliant stair. After numerous hours playing with SB, AS, and the AC stair tools, my conclusion is to skip the additional cost and hassles of an add-on. ALL methods require 2D work arounds for documentation.
2007-11-15 01:59 AM
2007-11-15 02:30 AM
2007-11-15 05:12 PM
seattleguy wrote:Look on the bright side -- I just saved you a couple of hundred dollars in software and countless hours of frustration. (Stairs are the one subject I've spent the most time researching -- I've dedicated
LauraNONE will produce an ADA compliant stair. After numerous hours playing with SB, AS, and the AC stair tools, my conclusion is to skip the additional cost and hassles of an add-on. ALL methods require 2D work arounds for documentation.
Well, that was generally my fear... I was just really hoping for, well, apparently the impossible.
rwallis wrote:Very well put, Robert.
In conclusion, the complexity and hassle of managing Add-ons has eroded our confidence in investing in them.
2007-11-15 05:44 PM
rwallis wrote:Encina is making every effort to make this easier:
However, a bigger issue should be, are add-ons worth it?
...the complexity and hassle of managing Add-ons has eroded our confidence in investing in them.
2007-11-22 06:08 AM