How do I slow down my ArchiCAD 9 animations?

[Anonymous]

I am trying to make my first rendered animation in ArchiCAD 9.
Everything looks great, but my movie is over in seconds.

How do I make a longer, and much slower Quicktime movie in ArchiCAD 9? Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Grenderer

[Dwight]

Study the compression settings box for animations to see the frame rate choices,but accelerating and decelerating the animation camera path smoothly is impossible.

[Anonymous]

grenderer wrote:
How do I make a longer, and much slower Quicktime movie in ArchiCAD 9?

More frames between cameras.

[Anonymous]

s2art wrote:

grenderer wrote:
How do I make a longer, and much slower Quicktime movie in ArchiCAD 9?

More frames between cameras.

OK, thanks. Will more cameras (keyframes) in my path help as well?
Also, I might stall at each keyframe too.....anything to add more time to this presentation.

Todd

[Anonymous]

More keyframes will give more control of path (if you need it). As for stalling at each keyframe, this might look a bit odd if you move to a point, pause, move off again, pause. Maybe if you pause, then start from a different point (i.e. new path, probably with a pause at start too) and edit scenes together.
Check this thread from Dwight http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=6665 , and if it doesn't put you off completely try the combination with "quality stills" idea. Sounds good to me, haven't had a chance to use it yet myself.

[Anonymous]

s2art wrote:
More keyframes will give more control of path (if you need it). As for stalling at each keyframe, this might look a bit odd if you move to a point, pause, move off again, pause. Maybe if you pause, then start from a different point (i.e. new path, probably with a pause at start too) and edit scenes together.
Check this thread from Dwight http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=6665 , and if it doesn't put you off completely try the combination with "quality stills" idea. Sounds good to me, haven't had a chance to use it yet myself.

Thanks, Stuart (and everyone else), I shall look into that too.

Todd