cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
EN
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

BIMcloud SaaS tenant region assignment causes unacceptable latency in Latin America

mendezarcediego
Booster

BIMcloud SaaS tenants are assigned to a Google Cloud Platform region based on country of purchase, with no option to select or request a different region. Graphisoft's own documentation acknowledges that latency directly impacts Teamwork performance, particularly Send & Receive operations, and directs users to verify their latency using GCPing.com before committing to SaaS. Reference:

 

https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/BIMcloud-Software-as-a-Service-Connection-Test...

 

We followed that recommendation. The results, measured from Costa Rica using GCPing.com, show the following:

Screenshot 2026-04-12 at 08.24.25.png

São Paulo (southamerica-east1), which is the assigned region for Costa Rica: 180ms South Carolina (us-east1), the best performing region from our location: 85ms North Virginia (us-east4): 93ms Dallas (us-south1): 108ms

 

São Paulo is not only the worst performing region in the Americas from Costa Rica, it ranks on par with European cities including London, Madrid, Paris, and Belgium. It performs worse than every US region by a significant margin, and it is geographically further from Costa Rica than multiple US options.

 

Graphisoft's own network requirements documentation states that slow round-trips significantly affect operations requiring multiple packet exchanges between client and server, specifically naming Send & Receive. At 180ms base latency, every Teamwork operation accumulates this penalty across multiple round-trips, making daily Teamwork use genuinely impractical.

Notably, Graphisoft does not publish a maximum acceptable latency threshold anywhere in the connection test documentation. Users are directed to check their latency without being given a pass or fail benchmark. This means firms in affected regions can unknowingly purchase Collaborate subscriptions, complete the recommended connection test, and still have no basis to evaluate whether their assigned region is acceptable.

 

The request has two parts.

First, publish a clear maximum acceptable latency threshold in the connection test documentation so that firms can make an informed purchasing decision before committing to a subscription.

 

Second, allow tenant region selection at purchase, or at minimum allow firms to request reassignment to the lowest-latency available region. Locking tenant assignment to country of purchase without any recourse is not acceptable when the assigned region demonstrably fails to support the product's core workflow.

 

This affects all of Central America and likely other Latin American countries facing similar routing. It is a verifiable, measurable infrastructure gap that makes a paid feature non-functional for an entire region, and it directly contradicts the product promise of seamless cloud collaboration regardless of location.

4 Comments
mendezarcediego
Booster

 @Ricardo Lopez We're in Costa Rica as you know and got assigned to São Paulo, which gives us 180ms latency on GCPing. Wondering if Panama has the same problem or got a better region.

Ricardo Lopez
Advisor

Hi @mendezarcediego 

I totally agree; here in Panama we have the same problem: a latency of 181 ms in São Paulo compared to less than 100 ms in the U.S.

20260413_GCPing_Panama.jpg

In any case, it appears that the servers hosting BIMcloud domains are located on Google's servers in the United States. You can check the specific location by entering your BIMcloud domain name on websites such as: https://www.iplocation.net/ip-lookup

mendezarcediego
Booster

@Ricardo Lopez this interesting, Nicaragua, Costa Rica’s northern neighbor, was assigned to a faster region.

Screenshot 2026-04-13 at 11.22.07.png

Coming from BIMcloud Basic, BIMcloud SaaS is already slower under ideal conditions. But even if we were routed through the fastest available region, the service would still be worse than that baseline. Instead we are assigned to São Paulo at 180ms, when South Carolina sits at 85ms from the same location.

So we are not just below the SaaS ideal, we are well below it. This all makes me wonder if it is even worth asking to be assigned to another region because it seems that won't even solve the problem...

 

As others have noted here, Panama is in the same situation and Nicaragua gets US-West. The pattern is clear.

 

Who else is affected? Drop your country and your GCPing numbers below and let's map this properly.

Status
Open

with 2/200 Votes 100%