License delivery maintenance is planned for Saturday, July 26, between 12:00 and 20:00 CEST. During this time, you may experience outages or limited availability across our services, including BIMcloud SaaS, License Delivery, Graphisoft ID (for customer and company management), Graphisoft Store, and BIMx Web Viewer. More details…
2025-02-24
12:23 PM
- last edited on
2025-02-25
08:19 PM
by
Laszlo Nagy
Regarding this "already closed" thread from 2018 https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Base-Quantities-with-IFC-export/m-p/257... , with a last comment by @stefan , I wanted to update the features from the IFC 4.0.2.1. schema version regarding IfcPile Base Quantities:
https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/DEV/IFC4_2/FINAL/HTML/link/qto_pilebasequantities.htm
And this is how Graphisoft Archicad 28 uses IFC4 RV adding Base Quantities checkbox to publish a Pile
Operating system used: Windows 28.0.3. (3120) INT FULL
2025-02-25 08:22 PM
So, if I understand correctly, instead of exporting 8 IFC Base Quantities, as defined by the IFC 4 schema, Archicad exports only the "NetVolume" Base Quantity for Ifc Piles?
Question: how did you model the element? Using the Column tool/a Library Part/Morph tool/other?
Can you check if there are any differences when modeling it using the various options?
2025-02-25 09:30 PM
Hi @Laszlo Nagy
The tool choice creates different outputs, regardless the correct class mapping.
Here you have the three scenarios:
2025-02-25 09:48 PM
Thanks for the images. OK, no matter which tool is used, only the "NetVolume" is generated in the IFC file.
I will forward this to GS HQ.
2025-02-26 03:16 PM
Thanks.
Notice that there was also one without QTO_ and it was the Object tool.