2010-08-17 12:50 AM
2010-08-17 11:45 PM
2010-08-19 06:42 PM
Tripp wrote:Ok, well maybe not "perfectly," but close. After working with gnauck a bit more on this, he was able to supply a "raw" version of the xyz file - which was effectively a cleaned up version (read: all duplicate points were eliminated) of the txt file. It converted into a mesh seamlessly. When overlaid on the mesh derived from Karl's "cleaned" txt file, there were some minor differences in triangulation as viewed in plan, which therefore leads me to assume there were minor differences in the mesh at the edges.
After converting the "clean" file into a mesh, I overlaid an xref of the 2d contours and triangulation points (.dwg). Between the mesh and .dwg everything appears to match up perfectly.!
2010-08-19 07:20 PM
2010-08-19 09:06 PM
2010-08-19 09:09 PM
gnauck wrote:
use the raw xyz data from the survey without breaklines or voids
2010-08-20 02:40 PM
Tripp wrote:Not necessarily, two identical meshes can result in two different triangulation results, see this thread:
When overlaid on the mesh derived from Karl's "cleaned" txt file, there were some minor differences in triangulation as viewed in plan, which therefore leads me to assume there were minor differences in the mesh at the edges.
2011-01-28 10:38 AM
2011-01-28 05:07 PM