2006-02-20 08:34 PM
2006-02-20 10:03 PM
2006-02-20 11:07 PM
Mike wrote:the last time i tried was VPC6 with windows 2000 pro and an early release of archiCAD 9 . . . it pretty much ground to a halt. definitely
I obviously will take a performance hit, but will it run "good enough".
2006-02-20 11:37 PM
2006-02-20 11:44 PM
Mike wrote:Mike,
Has anyone tried to run Archicad under virtual PC on a Mac. An odd question I know, but I do some training and cringe at the thought of buying a PC. It would be ideal if I could have a Mac laptop and run in virtual PC mode for training sessions with PC users. I obviously will take a performance hit, but will it run "good enough".
2006-02-21 12:15 AM
Ralph wrote:Running natively may not really come to pass. There are serious obstacles to booting XP on the new Macs, and Vista may be difficult as well (see: this article for a depressing view of things).
I expect Virtual PC (or something equivalent) to become quite impressive when running natively on the new Intel-based machines. I can't predict how far off that is though.
2006-02-21 07:17 PM
Matthew wrote:Running 'natively' doesn't necessarily mean booting the computer in Windows. For example, Virtual PC is also available for Windows to allow for multiple versions of Windows to be used simultaneously one computer. In this context, applications run very quickly. The underlying hardware is the key - the closer it is to a 'standard' wintel platform, the faster it can potentially run. Emulating the processor, for example, is a costly process and one of the main reasons Windows currently runs slowly under Virtual PC on a Mac.
Running natively may not really come to pass. There are serious obstacles to booting XP on the new Macs, and Vista may be difficult as well