Hi Andrew
Yep that's what I missed, thinking I had corrected it, (in wrong place).
As soon as I checked back at pg 65 (chamfer) somehow it knew that 1/16" was what I had last attempted, and it could now be 1/16" , and so it changed itself:--))
And I was glad to see the gap as 1/16" looked very similar your 0 gap parameter.
I guess in this I've learned a bit of inflexibility in AC(model) and gdl.
I think I will have to learn to live with 1/8" in gdl because I don't want to have to deal with 1/16ths in model....wait....hold the presses...what if..
in the master(or some other way) script (as Roberto hinted?) there was a statement that said or implied; 0 is > 0 ??; or something like that?
Is that how you got gap that says 0;(but isn't) in the script I downloaded (and did not modify), at first?
But I did check your master script and found nothing there.
Sorry to be such a pest. And I bet you'll be glad when I get to page 504?
Roberto,
I'm still analyzing at what you said.