ā2007-04-03 10:00 AM
ā2007-05-03 12:20 AM
ā2007-05-03 04:21 AM
Dennis wrote:
It's officially here!
http://www.graphisoft.com/products/archicad/ac11/
ā2007-05-03 10:11 AM
Bricklyne wrote:Now that I am no longer constrained by the NDA (I presume), I can at least say there are certainly quite a few little tweaks that I am happy about. Foremost among them I would say is improved layer combination management (thanks to a request from James Murray if I'm not mistaken).
Other than that I would hope that there are few other hidden improvements and upgrades not highlighted in the brochures and videos and I'll be ready to consider this a very good upgrade to the current version.
ā2007-05-03 11:00 AM
ā2007-05-03 01:10 PM
ā2007-05-03 03:00 PM
ā2007-05-03 05:30 PM
Bricklyne wrote:I hear this is the case. There was one firm at the Meeting that has been using AC11 on their projects for the past 3 months without (significant) incidence.
. . . so I would hope it is just as stable.
ā2007-05-03 06:49 PM
Rob wrote:This is correct. I know it may not sound like much, but these were two items missing from the fundamental functionality of AC, and it's a pleasure to see them addressed.
metanoia,
1. interior elevation gives you a chain of elevations in one go (eg 4 walls in a room) by placing a (star-like) marker in the room. It's virtually same to an elevation but it's automated as described (eg. you would use that typically for amenities or wet areas elevation arrangements etc)
2. linkage
you want to cross-link your markers throughout whole project so eg. a section marker in 2D detail (or anywhere else I suppose) will be automatically linked to a real section. It was possible to do so within 3D environment of AC but when it got to crunch with detailing in 2D we could not use 'live' - meaning linked section and markers. That's how I understand Laura.
ā2007-05-03 06:57 PM
ā2007-05-03 08:06 PM
Matthew wrote:YappiBricklyne wrote:Now that I am no longer constrained by the NDA (I presume), I can at least say there are certainly quite a few little tweaks that I am happy about. Foremost among them I would say is improved layer combination management (thanks to a request from James Murray if I'm not mistaken).
Other than that I would hope that there are few other hidden improvements and upgrades not highlighted in the brochures and videos and I'll be ready to consider this a very good upgrade to the current version.