IMO - Questions ought not be written by GS - but by CAD managers, as we have expectations for performance, productivity and organization that even GS seems oblivious to...
Just because someone knows how to put together beam or room schedules, doesn't mean they are good modelers, or that they can construct a 'light' model (read polygon count) while still having a rich level of information, with the least amount of 2D cleanup, or how to keep libraries tidy, or troubleshooting common AC-related errors such as missing parts, intersection-priority and display-related issues, dimension preferences not 'saving' with views, etc, etc.
I can't tell you how lost most of our staff were when it came to properly setting up, exporting (DWG) or publishing a project - people that would be considered expert users since version 6. Also it (the test) seems entirely lacking in any kind of workflow-related questions, ie. what is the best way to organize a sheet of details, or how can one get the best, editable data into DWG format, including Titleblocks, etc. from AC/PM. Or what is the best strategy for representing several design options within a single archicad model?
Maybe some would consider these issues unrelated to the software itself, but I would beg to differ.
Andy Thomson, M.Arch, OAA, MRAICDirector
Thomson Architecture, Inc.Instructor/Lecturer, Toronto Metropolitan University Faculty of Engineering & Architectural Science
AC26/iMacPro/MPB Silicon M2Pro