FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF LIGHTWORKS NOW!!!!

[Dwight]

I think that Graphisoft should completely implement the LightWorks Rendering features in Archicad.

Do you agree?

Visit

http://www.lightwork.com/

to see what this rendering engine can do once completely implemented in an application.

Vote Essential.

[Anonymous]

Dwight wrote:
I think that Graphisoft should completely implement the LightWorks Rendering features in Archicad.
Do you agree?

YEAH MAN!

We want full LW 7.6 features and a decent Material editor with a real-time preview window with drag-and-drop features.

Just for the start! 😉

[Anonymous]

LW shows what we can not make with GS.
LW 7.6 shold be updated with AC 10!!!!!!

[__archiben]

Dwight wrote:
Vote Essential.

love to. where's the poll?

~/archiben

[Anonymous]

One question? If we were willing to pay the difference, what would it cost? Could it be implemented? What would need to be changed / added by GS?? Just wondering.

[Dwight]

I can't make a poll.

I tried to cancel the message.

It didn't work.

Someone else please make the poll.

It HAS happened where the radiosity function costs more. Form Zee for instance.

[__archiben]

Dwight wrote:
I can't make a poll.

have you been banned for causing dissent? i'd better watch out . . .

(start another one . . ?)

~/archiben

[Rob]

the poll created at:
http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=11783

bring it on...

[Anonymous]

Radiosity takes time to render it.
Why must GS choose the worst one from LW?
I want to try LW with other programm.
Does have somebody experiance with it?

[Anonymous]

Archi wrote:
Radiosity takes time to render it.
Why must GS choose the worst one from LW?
I want to try LW with other programm.
Does have somebody experiance with it?

Try turbocad professional, it has radiosity enabled lightworks, and it only costs a few hundered bucks