In general could the Site & Planting Libraries be more complete and consistent ?
Is this a core aspect of sustainable design and something most users need in every project...?
What is the status of the TERRAIN TOOL ADD ON ?
AC Tree Model Detailed is a favourite yet it only seems deciduous (no conifer equivalent) and there are form limitations.
Favourites for various species also need botanical research - could these be offered regionally...?
In general can dependency on any 3rd party for updates and costs also be problematic ?
Here are examples from ArchiRADAR
https://www.archiradar.it/en/3d-objects/objects-on-sale/category/view/44
Are these collections incomplete nor bioregionally grouped ?
Cadimage also had the start of a database driven 'Planting' library - abandoned after AC16 as one example
It also added many materials / surfaces that increased ArchiCAD's punitive attribute overhead.
Thanks...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.