Collaboration with other software
About model and data exchange with 3rd party solutions: Revit, Solibri, dRofus, Bluebeam, structural analysis solutions, and IFC, BCF and DXF/DWG-based exchange, etc.

IFC who's using it?

Anonymous
Not applicable
We've had a few more companies recently wanting to know more about IFC & how to support it.

Just wanted to know how many people on here are actively using IFC ??
30 REPLIES 30
Anonymous
Not applicable
yes it's hardly perfect, but there isn't really much option...
great feedback though, i'll pass it on. As everybody seems to be thinking about it a lot more now.
NandoMogollon
Expert
I used it in the company I used to work for in Southafrica. That's a yes.
Here in Canada, still waiting to see it hapening. Maybe yes, since it is Revit territory.
Nando Mogollon
Director @ BuilDigital
nando@buildigital.com.au
Using, Archicad Latest AU and INT. Revit Latest (have to keep comparing notes)
More and more... IFC.js, IFCOpenShell
All things Solibri and BIMCollab
Anonymous
Not applicable
NandoMogollon wrote:
I used it in the company I used to work for in Southafrica. That's a yes.
Here in Canada, still waiting to see it hapening. Maybe yes, since it is Revit territory.
Hi Nando, that's interesting to hear, i thought Canada might have been a head of South Africa - great to hear they are supporting it.
Mats_Knutsson
Advisor
owen wrote:
Using it ...

export / import processes on large projects to be excruciatingly slow (i would say unworkable if there were any alternative)

cheers,

owen
It's slow but it has become better. However you don't push the button very often. It's only when you actually want to communicate a revised version to/from your partners in crime. But opening a fully modelled IFC-file from MagiCAD is a nice time to have a cup of coffee and chat with your friends.

AC 25 SWE Full

HP Zbook Fury 15,6 G8. 32 GB RAM. Nvidia RTX A3000.
Chadwick
Newcomer
We tried to use IFCs on a project where we were teamed up with another firm that uses ArchiCAD. It did not work out. Its nice to know that IFCs are progressing but its not a realistic option at this point. Too much information is lost or doesn't come through as 'smart'. We are definitely keeping an eye on it though...
RA 2012 x64, Piranesi 6 Pro, Sketchup 8, Windows 7 Pro x64, Intel Core i7, 10GB RAM, ATI Radeon Mobile 5870
Anonymous
Not applicable
Chadwick wrote:
We tried to use IFCs on a project where we were teamed up with another firm that uses ArchiCAD. It did not work out. Its nice to know that IFCs are progressing but its not a realistic option at this point. Too much information is lost or doesn't come through as 'smart'. We are definitely keeping an eye on it though...
Ok so which software were you using, revit, bentley?
Chadwick
Newcomer
Revit Architecture 2010. We'd have windows that would appear solid, doors in different places. Plain old geometry wasn't showing up correctly much less the information in the different components/families.
RA 2012 x64, Piranesi 6 Pro, Sketchup 8, Windows 7 Pro x64, Intel Core i7, 10GB RAM, ATI Radeon Mobile 5870
Anonymous
Not applicable
Chadwick wrote:
Revit Architecture 2010. We'd have windows that would appear solid, doors in different places. Plain old geometry wasn't showing up correctly much less the information in the different components/families.
thanks, yes that seems to be a common problem. eg it takes your model & essentially simplifies it (eg lose data). which in a lot of cases is still fine. I guess the different softwares also have different import/export engines to...
Anonymous
Not applicable
owen wrote:
I have found export / import processes on large projects to be excruciatingly slow
Which version of ArchiCAD are you using? (Your sig line says 10+.) The IFC translation has gotten a lot faster, especially in 14.
Anonymous
Not applicable
Chadwick wrote:
Revit Architecture 2010. We'd have windows that would appear solid, doors in different places. Plain old geometry wasn't showing up correctly much less the information in the different components/families.
Some of what you describes sounds like it could be fixed with a little prep of the templates/file settings.

I have gotten fully detailed and accurate exchange of walls, door and windows by setting up the process carefully. There are still problems with the way Revit builds the families from the imported doors which I have only been able to fix (so far) by switching them to my own native families after the fact. This only matters if the Revit model is for further editing. As a reference for structure or MEP coordination the imported model works just fine.

Ceilings have always been a problem. Export has improved from AC14. Revit still doesn't recognize the imported elements as ceilings, but it won't even recognize the ceilings in it's own IFC export so this is more of a Revit problem. At least they are still editable elements.

I have seen a number of troubling errors in structural model translations. These may be fixed now with the latest release of AC14 but I haven't had time to check lately.

There will always be difficulties with IFC exchange if only because the requirements are so complex (and complicated) and the working methods and standards are so different from one program to the next. The good news is that IFC has finally become usable and practical for a lot of purposes and this will only improve with time.

Oh, and yes, I do use IFC occasionally.