2012-09-21 01:32 AM
2012-09-21 06:48 AM
2012-10-11 12:27 AM
2012-10-11 10:58 AM
Karl wrote:The models are constructed from a series of photos taken from different vantage points. Most of the weird effects occur because something changed between photos, e.g. cars either left or arrived, or lighting levels/shadows changed drastically. When the photos are merged, you get an amalgamation of everything in the photos, e.g. an empty parking lot merged with a full one (so the cars appear to blend with the pavement). It's a bit like taking a photo with low light levels and seeing things smeared or ghosted across the image. I'm constantly disappointed with the tech media, who should know (and explain) these things, but instead choose to feign ignorance in order to mock the results.
look like the cars have melted into the pavement.
2012-10-11 09:53 PM
2012-10-12 04:27 PM
2012-10-12 04:45 PM
Miki wrote:No competing product is perfect. Google maps, for example, has satellite photos where I live that are many, many years out of date and show many local businesses in the wrong place. The doctor's surgery, for example, is shown about a mile from its real location. Some new roads are missing. If I ask for directions, it will happily suggest I can drive up a stepped pedestrian walk-way that cannot be negotiated in a vehicle. My sat-nav occasionally doesn't know about new roads or intersection changes, e.g. changes from a roundabout to lights or changes to turning restrictions, and once tried to send me the wrong way up a one-way street.
It is irrelevant for the end user why it is happening. The fact is that competition have the 3D model without this problems.
2012-10-14 10:34 PM