Another factor is that Artlantis can handle hugely complex models, while there's definitely a limit to how much model you can shoe-horn into BimX. I also think the iVisit viewer might be easier for a client to understand and use. The BimX interface can be rather challenging to some and there's still something a little clunky about the way you move around, bumping into walls and things. You also have better control over what the client sees in an iVisit presentation.
But going off on a tangent, the effectiveness of static panoramas is always going to be greatly weakened by the fact that they cannot show parallax. The way things shift in space in relation to each other and to a moving viewer is one of the things the brain processes to create depth in perspective, probably more important than even stereoscopic vision. I think BimX just lights up more areas of the brain than iVisit. But maybe that's just brain damage from bumping into all those walls.
David Collins
Win10 64bit Intel i7 6700 3.40 Ghz, 32 Gb RAM, GeForce RTX 3070
AC 27.0 (4001 INT FULL)
