Placing walls by cores
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2005-06-01
07:58 PM
- last edited on
‎2023-05-30
03:26 PM
by
Rubia Torres
‎2005-06-01
07:58 PM
Why is it that you cannot place a wall based on the core rather than the face? I see the dimension to core option, but when placing walls I usually go to face of framing rather than finish, but I still want the finish to show. Any suggestions?
DWyckoff
Master of Time and Space
Whenever the wife lets me
A/C27, OSX12.7.5
Master of Time and Space
Whenever the wife lets me
A/C27, OSX12.7.5
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Dimension Tools
2 REPLIES 2
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2005-06-01 08:29 PM
‎2005-06-01
08:29 PM
Would the offset reference line help? Just offset the ref line by the non-core thickness of one side. In the settings dialog at the upper right.
Possible trouble: Detection of the framing intersections rather than the surface intersections is unreliable at some wall junctions, T's for example. For this reason, I don't draw stud walls this way, though I do dimension the cores. I would rather use the reliable outside surfaces and mentally subtract the 1/2" on each side. YMMV.
Possible trouble: Detection of the framing intersections rather than the surface intersections is unreliable at some wall junctions, T's for example. For this reason, I don't draw stud walls this way, though I do dimension the cores. I would rather use the reliable outside surfaces and mentally subtract the 1/2" on each side. YMMV.
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2005-06-01 10:09 PM
‎2005-06-01
10:09 PM
James wrote:You would need to know the required offset rather than the offset being defined by the particular composite being used.
Just offset the ref line by the non-core thickness of one side.