2011-07-30 01:28 AM - last edited on 2023-05-22 11:59 PM by Gordana Radonic
2011-07-30 06:51 PM
Dennis wrote:I believe so. As I update our template for AC15, I've been hesitant to do away with all of the DEMO/EXST Layers and Layer Combinations. I believe we can do without most but not all.
Does this mean that for all the annotation elements it is still better to have a different layer combo for the different plans?
2011-07-30 08:22 PM
2011-07-30 11:03 PM
2011-07-30 11:08 PM
2011-07-31 12:31 AM
Laura wrote:Great idea!
It's a shame all elements don't have an "Ignore Renovation Filter Overrides" setting -- as there are always exceptions to every rule.
2011-07-31 01:12 AM
Karl wrote:Yes! Plus, get EVERYTHING to have the renovation status field, including those section, elevation, detail markers.Laura wrote:Great idea!
It's a shame all elements don't have an "Ignore Renovation Filter Overrides" setting -- as there are always exceptions to every rule.
2011-07-31 01:19 AM
vfrontiers wrote:Nice idea too, but I think the dimensions and annotations taking on the hidden line is something I can live with. Like I said, have the dimensions be "existing" status, and for the dimension string that deals with demo items, have that dimension be set to show up on "demo" filter only. For leader notes, the arrow can be a hidden line, but since the leader itself can be different angle from most construction items, it won't be as confusing as having dimension lines showing up same line type as demo construction items. Otherwise, you can make the leader notes "existing" filter with manual setting to show on "demo" filter only as well.
You are on to something here...
GS WISH... Put in a DIMENSIONS and LABEL override as well... (ie, to NOT subject them to overrides)..
For your issue now, though... From the cuff here... what about working it back words...
Start your DEMO STUFF with DASHED lines and override to SOLID for PRE DEMOLITION status... Then you can keep your DEMO LABELS drawn SOLID and overridden to SOLID with the filter...
Just a thought (haven't flushed it thru all the way.. but see what you can do with it..
2011-07-31 01:25 AM
Laura wrote:Thanks for your feedback. It's good to know I'm not missing something obvious. I guess getting rid of the DEMO/ EXST layers for all construction elements at least is a good thing! Glass half full...Dennis wrote:I believe so. As I update our template for AC15, I've been hesitant to do away with all of the DEMO/EXST Layers and Layer Combinations. I believe we can do without most but not all.
Does this mean that for all the annotation elements it is still better to have a different layer combo for the different plans?
2011-07-31 03:40 AM