2007-05-17 04:49 PM - last edited on 2024-07-09 08:43 AM by Aruzhan Ilaikova
2007-05-17 05:09 PM
2007-05-17 06:57 PM
2007-05-17 07:05 PM
Peter wrote:I don't know how VT10 compares to VT9, but I did not find VT9 very helpful -- it was comparable to just watching someone else going through the steps -- whereas the Step-by-Step is interactive.
I'd recommend the very comprehensive 'Virtual Tutor 10' DVD.
2007-05-17 07:56 PM
Laura wrote:Sounds interesting. Is it still up to date enough for AC10/11? I think I may need something like that for the boss to work through. I have to admit you need to be fairly focused to get the best out of VT and I don't think he has the time or enthusiasm. I wouldn't mind having a play with it myself if its fairly cheap!
.... whereas the Step-by-Step is interactive.
2007-05-17 10:07 PM
2007-05-17 10:28 PM
2007-05-18 12:45 AM
TomWaltz wrote:Tom,
I also think it would be better if it were done at something resembling a normal resolution, instead of 800x600.
2007-05-18 02:08 AM
2007-05-18 05:05 PM
Link wrote:I'd go along with 1280x1024.TomWaltz wrote:Tom,
I also think it would be better if it were done at something resembling a normal resolution, instead of 800x600.
what would you consider the average minumum screen resolution for ArchiCAD users? IME it is probably 1280x1024, but I wonder if other ArchiCAD users operate with a screen resolution lower than that?
2007-05-18 08:27 PM
Peter wrote:No it is not
It's created by Laszo Nagy who posts here often.
2007-05-18 09:21 PM
No it is notI always just assumed it was! Sorry the other Mr Nagy!
The VT author does have the same name but lives in Australia.
2007-05-21 05:28 PM
2007-05-21 05:52 PM