Which MacBook? (memory X processor/graphic card dilemma)

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-04-29 06:19 PM
1- less processor speed (2.2GHZ) and graphic card (512 MB), but more RAM (8GB):
2.2GHz quad-core
Intel Core i7
8GB 1333MHz RAM
500GB 5400-rpm
Intel HD Graphics 3000
AMD Radeon HD 6750M with 512MB GDDR5
price: $2,000
2- better processor speed (2.4GHZ) and graphic card (1 GB), but less RAM (4GB):
2.4GHz quad-core
Intel Core i7
4GB 1333MHz
750GB 5400-rpm
Intel HD Graphics 3000
AMD Radeon HD 6770M with 1GB GDDR5
price: $2,200
I am currently a 'one-man-show' using AC 14 on a mid 2010 MacBook Pro (2.66 GHZ dual-core, 4GB RAM), mostly for residential and other small projects.
I was not planning a hardware upgrade right now, but I was forced to, since my current notebook seems to have died (probably it will need a logic board replacement, for the 4th time!, these mid-2010 macbooks are known to have problems with their GeForce cards).
But I do plan to upgrade from AC14 to AC15, as soon as I finish old projects and start new ones.
In short, what would you prefer: 0.2 GHz more processor and 512 MB more graphic card, or 4GB more RAM and $200 more money in your pocket?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-04-29 10:40 PM
AC 19 6006 & AC 20
Mac OS 10.11.5
15" Retina MacBook Pro 2.6
27" iMac Retina 5K

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-05-03 11:19 PM
Anyway, I'm still curious about processor X memory performance improvement.
Which one of the two configurations above do you think it would work better for ArchiCAD?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-05-06 01:14 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-06-06 05:44 PM
(PS I'm not sure how long Apple take to get their product refreshes into Brazil - some countries seem to lag behind the USA by a considerable margin)
http://9to5mac.com/
http://arstechnica.com
16" M1 Max MacBook Pro 32GB, Apple Studio Display, MacOS 15 Sequoia
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-06-06 07:30 PM
aaha! design studio durango, co
27" retina 5k iMac 4ghz i7 os 10.13.6 m395x 4 mb, 32gb ram, 512 gb ssd ac 22 current
15" retina mbp 2.6ghz 1mb 16gb ac 22 current[/size]

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-06-26 02:17 PM
(decided against a Mac Pro as I feel that the current model is just holding the fort whilst Apple develop their latest generation Pro for next year -
16" M1 Max MacBook Pro 32GB, Apple Studio Display, MacOS 15 Sequoia
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-19 10:43 PM
PB wrote:Yes buy one!
New Retina MacBook Pro seems to be a very capable machine: Performance on a par with a high end iMac, portable, and with a gorgeous screen. My new workstation, me thinks...

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-19 10:55 PM

16" M1 Max MacBook Pro 32GB, Apple Studio Display, MacOS 15 Sequoia

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-08-04 08:44 AM
...very much looking forward to the improvement over my 2006 MBP ...
Durval, what was your eventual decision?
16" M1 Max MacBook Pro 32GB, Apple Studio Display, MacOS 15 Sequoia