2008-08-21 04:35 PM
2008-09-05 08:04 AM
2008-09-05 09:35 AM
2008-09-09 12:49 AM
Converting the object to XML with LibDev Toolkit gives following info of the GUIDs;that is exactly what I thought - GUID is just a set of pointers to data structures as you can see them exploded with XML.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Symbol UNID="{D20C9049-8F3F-11DA-A9BA-000D9344841C}-{870979BF-268E-4ACC-95DA-36A414FADA41}" Owner="1196638531" Version="23" Signature="1196644685" IsPlaceable="yes" IsArchivable="no">
<Ancestry SubIdent="0" Template="no" SectVersion="1" SectionFlags="0">
<UNID>{F938E33A-329D-4A36-BE3E-85E126820996}-{6CBED0C3-B08B-400F-AEC9-9625C3F2321D}</UNID>
<UNID>{103E8D2C-8230-42E1-9597-46F84CCE28C0}-{257A7271-109C-4C99-821D-566C0EAB2395}</UNID>
</Ancestry>
<!-- GDL SCRIPT ===== GDL SCRIPT ===== GDL SCRIPT ===== GDL SCRIPT ===== GDL SCRIPT -->
When the object is converted back to GSM the first part of the UNID {D20C9049-8F3F-11DA-A9BA-000D9344841C} remains static.
2008-09-17 06:32 PM
2008-09-19 12:01 AM
2008-09-19 07:54 AM
2008-09-30 05:03 PM
2008-09-30 06:24 PM
2008-09-30 07:15 PM
Erika wrote:Thanks for verifying....
Duane,
I followed your steps.
-After the first close/reopen file Yes, the marker reverted back to the first one.
- after the second close/reopen file all markers showed as dots/missing library part.
I selected and opened the label, yes it said it was missing. Re-selecting it brought the labels back. But reopening gives dots.
2008-10-01 12:13 AM