Wednesday
Does the concept of global libraries open the door also here to pay-per-use?
It seems that Nemetschek is heading in this direction:
It seems that Nemetschek is positioning itself as a store where you have to pay a substantial annual subscription fee just be able to pay endlessly for things that were previously free.
Please tell me that Archicad is not doing this.
Wednesday
Well, think the worst and you won't be far wrong 😅
Doesn´t seem like a smart move to limit development somehow, but I can see anything happening after last years changes...
Thursday
Well, then it's simple. Since our budget for these tokens, subscriptions and whatnot is quite limited, most of them will have to be discarded.
While we decide which to keep and which to discard, we will obviously take our sense of trust into account, such as not being treated like a cash cow and choose products where we have some returned value and doesn't try to strip us at each step.
It's bold of Nemetschek to do this since the main competitor doesn't, and it's really easy to switch to other products.
In the office, we instantly quit using Solibri. Much to my sorrow, but I had to agree. The idea of making you pay more for an upgrade, just to bind you into paying per usage, is just plain repulsive. And we are in the process of switching all our remaining Vectorworks licences into R.
Thursday
Honestly, it's entirely possible that this has already been decided at Nemetcheck level and that Graphisoft isn't aware of it. The problem is that this kind of scenario is very, very plausible.
Thursday
Total foot gun.
If that happens, good night! At some point, the self-inflicted damage is just too much. ☠️