Horizontal step in elevation.. you never know!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-21
03:14 AM
- last edited on
2023-05-25
06:14 PM
by
Rubia Torres
I really do search for answers before I post............mostly

Is it possible to get a vertical step in the section elevation?
Like the step you can put in on the horizontal section plane..
I have a staircase that I would like to get a full front elevation of but there is a bulkhead over the stair so my cutting plane will either:
loose the first few steps,
or
If I come back a bit with the cutting plane I will get the external elevation from FF level upwards.
If I could step this cutting plane, as in the red line in the image, it would solve my problems..
Thx
Tony

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-21 11:55 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-21 10:29 PM
Another way would be to use a layer combination in section that has the bulkhead turned off.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-21 11:06 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-22 04:37 AM
I will use the conjoined section approach I think... I find keeping on top of the layers isn't my strong point at the moment.. but thanks for the input..

Tony

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-22 06:21 PM
I assume you are printing from a layout - in which case, all you need to do is use a polygonal clipping frame on the layout to hide the bulkhead...if I understand your screenshot and red line correctly.
Just edit the initially-rectangular drawing frame using the pet palette's polygon tools to create any cookie cutter shape you want.
If I misunderstood and you want to see both, but to have the stairs cut at one place and the bulkhead at another, then Thomas' answer is the way to go.
Cheers,
Karl

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-22 10:43 PM
Karl wrote:Karl, if he does that, he'll also hide the uppermost three of four steps of the staircase. If the screenshot I see is correctly lined up.
I assume you are printing from a layout - in which case, all you need to do is use a polygonal clipping frame on the layout to hide the bulkhead..l
So if hiding the bulkhead is all he needs, I guess s2art's layer combination tip is a better way.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-05-23 12:55 AM
Thomas wrote:Not better, just different. Whatever floats your boat.Karl wrote:Karl, if he does that, he'll also hide the uppermost three of four steps of the staircase. If the screenshot I see is correctly lined up.
I assume you are printing from a layout - in which case, all you need to do is use a polygonal clipping frame on the layout to hide the bulkhead..l
So if hiding the bulkhead is all he needs, I guess s2art's layer combination tip is a better way.
