2024 Technology Preview Program:
Master powerful new features and shape the latest BIM-enabled innovations
2010-05-10 05:56 PM
2010-05-17 03:23 PM
2010-05-17 03:50 PM
Braza wrote:
And you expect that a considerable small (compared with autodesk) team like GS's could address all of your wishes and beat revit in one shot?
2010-05-17 03:54 PM
2010-05-17 04:56 PM
laszlonagy wrote:you're right
Dear Fellow Talkers, let me ask you to keep some basic rules of posting on ArchiCAD-Talk:
#1 - Don't get personal. Everyone's opinion counts. If you have one, voice it but don't try and hammer others for theirs.
#2 - Don't try and win debates by lengthy, many times repeated, arguments. If said once, that's enough - if you feel the need you can still refer back to it with a hyperlink.
#3 - Be constructive. This forum was setup by GRAPHISOFT for users to exchange ideas and to help each other implement ArchiCAD. Open criticism is fine but don't try and wage a war here.
Thank You all for keeping these basic guidelines when you next post on ArchiCAD-Talk.
2010-05-17 07:28 PM
Masse wrote:Braza wrote:
And you expect that a considerable small (compared with autodesk) team like GS's could address all of your wishes and beat revit in one shot?
Hello Braza
Certainly not ! but don't forget that at the beginning of year 2004 Philippe Raymond wrote:
"10 years ago ( 1994 !), I discovered a nice tool (stairmaker ), assuming the level of the architectural CAD, now, it is a lame duck. Did I miss some future improvement?
My wish? Less automatism and much more flexibility especially for the connection with railing and the shape of the treads (at least the first tread) ...and an acceptable geometry of curved slab bottom and railing"
ok it's here
.........
Laci wrote:Although the result of said response was just as effective as the wishlist section itself, given what we've been able to observe in terms of improvements to the Stair Tool since then, I can't help but wonder if this developer is actually still working at GS, and whether or not they actually took feedback from that thread or was just sent in to post because they "lost the coin toss" to address the users.
Following the discussion I must admit you are right Stairmaker needs improvements. At its current state it serves more German, European![]()
![]()
(Continental) needs rather than the standards of Anglo-Saxon traditions.
Some of your quotes are really useful for us, but would be better if you could exactly highlight what you are missing. We have a good idea but there can never be enough examples. If you could enclose drawings, pictures of stairs that you are unable to do by stairmaker would be ideal!
Thanks a lot!
2010-05-17 07:44 PM
Bricklyne wrote:
.........
A developer actually did respond in that thread (imagine that, a GS developer responding to users in a thread) :
Laci wrote:.........., I can't help but wonder if this developer is actually still working at GS, ........
.........
Some of your quotes are really useful for us, but would be better if you could exactly highlight what you are missing. We have a good idea but there can never be enough examples.......!
Link wrote:If that's the kind of developer that they are losing at GS, it would go a long way in explaining why Graphisoft's interaction with users on this forum and elsewhere is so lacking. It's too bad, because it sure seems like they could use a few more Laci's there.
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:26 am Post subject: Re: Graphisoft's involvement
Wouldn't hold your breath for an answer Marc, Laci doesn't work at GS anymore!![]()
Merry Christmas!
Cheers,
Link.
2010-05-17 11:28 PM
2010-05-18 09:20 AM
2010-05-18 02:57 PM
2010-05-18 09:31 PM