2008-05-09 09:47 AM
2008-06-17 02:54 AM
metanoia wrote:Archicad has that same limitation. You can repeat elements, but they won't have unique IDs or anything like that.
Doors in a linked and copied unit plan in Revit cannot have unique door numbers. The doors will appear in the schedule as many times as they appear in the model, but they all have the same door number. So the concept of a MOD file is absent in Revit.
2008-06-17 02:57 AM
Brett wrote:No. (to all of these)
Some questions answered of non advertised improvements please.(wouldn't it be good if GS publish a PDF of every little improvement they have done from AC 11)
Fill in Beams?
Fill in all instances of complex profiles?
HVAC?
Keynotes if any?
Revision tool?
Favorites holding there settings improved to where they actually do?
What happened to the pre advertised improvements to the indispensable grid tool?
Any improvement of roof slab dashed lines where they meet?(so they don't merge to a solid line)?I feel like I did see this somewhere, but I might have imagined it. (or maybe it was in a presentation on another software?)
Label tool enhanced?Only minimal (Labels for Curtain Wall elements and a new "label leader that goes all the way under the text, underlining it)
2008-06-17 03:08 AM
Don wrote:Just remember, its outline cannot be edited in plan. Only in the 3D window. Not a good limitation for a floor or ceiling tool to have.
From what I am aware of the "curtain wall tool" is almost a misnomer. It can be used to do tile floors, a raised computer floor, suspended ceiling tiles, can easily placed on a sloped surface such as a roof, make handrails, or even a tudor/timber framed wall.
As been discussed previously it really does blurs the line between wall, slab and roof elements.
2008-06-17 03:10 AM
Karl wrote:The multi-processing ability is limited to 4 processors.william235711 wrote:As many as you have.
How many cores are involved? How many processors? Is it for all tasks or just a limited number? Which ones?
It is not for all tasks at the moment - no doubt more to come in the future, but is used for many of them and the speed increase is quite noticeable from starting ArchiCAD, to regenerating sections/elevations and opening the 3D window.
2008-06-17 03:11 AM
Thomas wrote:I've been really underwhelmed with some features, but I think the speed increase alone is worth the upgrade price.
Still I think AC 12 is a very important and worthwhile upgrade. If not for anything else, get it for its speed! I think all the betatesters agree that going back to AC11 feels like wading in a swamp compared to AC12.
2008-06-17 03:13 AM
oreopoulos wrote:In your dreams. Let's give the GS team credit for some major reworking to get important parts of the program multithreaded so that they can take advantage of multiple processors/cores.
by the way, using openmp to create shared mutlicore aware functions is not hard at all.
2008-06-17 03:16 AM
Dennis wrote:I would. AC12 can only use 4 processors, but that's enough to warrant an upgrade in hardware.
1. Speed - Great. I have a core 2 duo. Would it make sense to upgrade the processor to quad or 8 core?
3. Partial Structure Display - Don't really need it too much myself - since I typically only model structure anyway. Maybe this will get me to use the composite walls for a change...I think it's mostly useful for structural drawings and exporting to a BIM-using structural engineer, but there could be other uses we've not come up with yet.
4. Hotlink Module Management - Sounds like a good improvement.For anyone using nested modules, this is HUGE.
5. Stairmaker Enhancements - I use Archistair so proabably not useful for me. Did it improve to a point where I don't need archistair?...No. The 2D symbols are a lot better though.
6. 3d Document - Great tool to finally show off the 3d in construction documents! Can't believe how many times I had to resort to a 2d view just to be able to get dimensions on them, and add a 3d view "for reference only" or color / material call outs at most.Not to mention, they are live (kind of like the Section window)
9. Align & Distribute - I thought we already had align. Also, distribute was possible w/ the multiply command, wasn't it?
11. Dimensioning Input Logic - Finally, logical way to do dimensions. Can't remember how many times I did a series of dimensions, double click, only to find out I had the vertical instead of horizontal...I hope there is the ability to put prefix or suffix to actual dimension..Much easier to place, still have an annoying flyout to change the placement method, and still no associative prefixes or suffixes.
12. PMK - I never used PMK before because I started in AC10. Would this be a good way to manage standard office details? Instead of making detail viewpoint, save view, copy detail name, set scale, layer combination for every single detail you want to re-use in a new project?They might be. That's kind of what I was thinking.
2008-06-17 03:19 AM
2008-06-17 03:24 AM
TomWaltz wrote:Christmas HAS come early!
Oh, that and the fact that Schedules now havelinewrap!!! 🙂
2008-06-17 03:25 AM
Brett wrote:A PMK is a transitional file used to put an Archicad drawing onto a layout in Plotmaker, a separate program that we used to have to use to create layouts.
Thanks for that Tom, Forgot one, Any improvement for transferring details from pln to pln without having to set up a new independent detail in the receiving pln? What's a PMK, before my time?