Transfering organical form
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-16
07:16 PM
- last edited on
2023-05-11
11:10 AM
by
Noemi Balogh
https://imgur.com/a/1XTqQ

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-16 07:50 PM
If you want a live link, you should script a proper GDL object for NURBS geometry. This is the hard way.
If a live link is not a priority, you always can save it in a 3dm file, and open it directly in Archicad. But again, it will be imported as GDL object.
May you should think how this geometry is going to be constructed, in order to rationalize those double curvatures. Once rationalized in planar faces you should now pass them to ArchiCAD without problems, may as roof elements.
Triangularization is easy, planar quadrilateral faces are possible, but much more complex operation required. Kangaroo plugin is of great help for rationalization operations.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-16 11:12 PM
By saying "composite" I meant the ArchiCAD composites, so I can define several skins for the shape I create. It would be much easier to see in section all the skins that I need rather than single material as it would be in case of typical morph. I'd like to create a "thing" that would act similar to let's say morph, mesh or anything like that BUT where I can "attach" composite to it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-17 01:10 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-17 05:05 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-18 11:09 AM
remember here that the last update of AC21 permit to hotlink 3dm files to the model.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-18 11:17 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-18 11:32 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-18 04:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsbyfC2usUk#
Though I notice some differences. First of all in tutorial the grid from lunchbox covers only selected surface while in my case it cover all the space adequate to points in command PointsOn. And so it does all the rationalizing for all the unnecessary surface. How do I get rid of it? Have I made a mistake while creating such surface? I made it using curve -> boundary surface, then - using PointsOn - I modeled desired shape. Or maybe there's something else wrong.
Also there's this problem with planarizing itself. During the simulation my shape almost completely loses its shape, its curvature which is quite important. Is there a way to prevent such a behavior? I beg for help.

https://imgur.com/a/5oDpu
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2017-11-18 04:25 PM