Whether the bridge assessment works as a real design development tool, not just an oooh that image looks pretty?Well, if you provide information how the displayed Psi-value is calculated under the hood, it could be used for a design tool, right now it's pretty images with numbers around it to look credible. /s
How did you assess u-values for elements/skins with bridges e.g. masonry / mortar walls & timber framing through the insulation?Theoretically you could try calculating the U-value based on the composite (1D unbridged losses), then draw the unbridged construction and simulate (e.g. 1m long wall), compare and understand the results, then draw the bridged construction and adjust the U-value for the 2D effect. I'm not sure why you would need a 3D simulation for this, you can further adjust your calculations. EDS is not capable of 3D thermal bridging according to its documentation.
There is no reference to condensation risk assessment, can EDS identify this within the software?If you have access to the temperature values, you can do an fRsi calculation based on the minimum internal surface temperature (there isn't any display for this in the UI, you can only eyeball this, I think).
4. PHPP fabric data outputwhat do you mean by "PHPP fabric"?
We are being driven into a single model for construction and structural engineering