License Delivery maintenance is expected to occur on Saturday, November 30, between 8 AM and 11 AM CET. This may cause a short 3-hours outage in which license-related tasks: license key upload, download, update, SSA validation, access to the license pool and Graphisoft ID authentication may not function properly. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Visualization
About built-in and 3rd party, classic and real-time rendering solutions, settings, workflows, etc.

!Restored: view cone angle vs. camera lens focal length

Anonymous
Not applicable
I'm trying to align an ac camera view with a photo of the site (set as the 3d window background); the ac align view function is not useful in this specific context as there are no adjacent existing (vertical) elements to use as references. I've been able to get the view relatively aligned manually, but have found the main variable that is affecting the accuracy is the view cone setting; so:

the photo information says it was taken at a 28mm focal length; how does this relate to the view cone figure? that is, what would be the conversion factor?
12 REPLIES 12
Anonymous
Not applicable
Robs chart at the top of THIS THREAD would suggest 28mm equates to approximately 75 degree view cone, but I'm not sure its a s easy as that. Have a go though.
Dwight
Newcomer
You need to: establish the angular view of your specific camera at 28mm, probably a lens chart at manufacturer site. then: make a diagram as to how this diagonal measure might relate to Archicad's horizontal view angle. [as long as the view taken is horizontal]

It is a challenge.
Remember also to allow for the image being cropped.
Dwight Atkinson
Anonymous
Not applicable
thanks.
Dwight
Newcomer
I just thought of a tip for getting the convergence right if you know the corners of your lot:
visualize a lot sized slab and match that to the corners in the picture background.
Dwight Atkinson
Karl Ottenstein
Moderator
Also note - discussed at length in older threads - that 28mm is a wide angle setting, and is pretty much guaranteed to have barrel distortion in the photo. (Were there vertical lines of built elements in the photo, they would appear to be bent.) Without removing the distortion with a Photoshop filter/manipulation - or if the camera had a special lens, you will not be able to align a computer model with an existing structure with any great success. Getting the scale right even after correcting for distortion is an art.

Cheers,
Karl
One of the forum moderators
AC 28 USA and earlier   •   macOS Sonoma 14.7.1, MacBook Pro M2 Max 12CPU/30GPU cores, 32GB
Dwight
Newcomer
That's part of the problem: if the file knows its focal length, it is a digital file and probably from a sensor smaller than full frame 35mm. If so, the expressed view angle of 28mm will be considerably narrower that we might expect.

Not that any image from a crapcam won't have distortion - also from the fact it was probably hand held and not made from a tripod.
Dwight Atkinson
Anonymous
Not applicable
Would it not be better to work the other way, i.e. don't calculate it, but tweak until it's right?

The method I generally use -
- Model the extents of the site using a temporary slab.
- Adjust the cameras position on plan to the correct position using either an map/site survey/aerial photo to scale placed on the floorplan.
- Then adjust the relative height of the camera compared to the 0.00m level on the building, remembering to add on 1.7 or 1.5m for the tripod level.
- Set the view cone to around 75 degrees (for a compact camera with 6-17mm focal length try starting at 55 deg).
- Manually reduce/increase this figure until the same amount of site is visible, while also recentreing the view.
- I like to use the 'classic 3d navigation' to subtly tweak my position as I find it gives much finer control than the standard 'explore' mode.
- Remember to keep clicking the 'modify the selected' button to update the camera after each manual tweak.

What would be really useful is for ArchiCAD to read the metadata from an image used as a background, extract the date and time and set the up the sun angle and position correctly all automatically.
Dwight
Newcomer
Your method is inevitable for success - reliance on formulae and automatic tools being useless - but placing a model in a photo, as authoritative as it appears, can only ever be an approximation.

When Graphisoft made the Align View tool it was a kneejerk to a competitor's tool. And it works, but only in a perfect image, and that never happens with photography.
Dwight Atkinson
Fran_ois Chatelain
Contributor
Hi guys,
it seems to me that you forget to mention the ratio of the 3D/rendering window which should match the photo you want to align too. If the ratio doesn't match the photo's, whatever camera angle you set will be off.
If the photo is digital, the EXIF will give you a fair bit of information, which can be further investigated by checking the camera specs (crop factor...) on the manufacturer website or dpreview dot com.
Now, as a quick help, here's a few horizontal angle values for some common focal lengths (3:2 ratio):
24mm = 76.3deg
28mm = 67.9deg
35mm = 56.6deg
50mm = 41.3deg
85mm = 25deg
But then again, one should allow for some margin depending on lens manufacturer 😉

Cheers
Francois
François Chatelain
Worldwide Digital Imaging
Formerly posting as RanXerox
"A little bump will help blur your reflections"