2010-12-02 09:52 PM
2010-12-06 11:23 AM
Karl wrote:and may I add, that there are some windows, that can't be resized at all!!!archislave wrote:And finally (!) inheriting the Microsoft Windows functionality of being able to stretch the size of a window by any of the corners, not just the lower right. Such a "duh" thing, you wonder if MS had a patent on it or something that Apple was so stubborn to cripple such a simple thing for so many years...
This new Lion is going to be a huge advance of OSX to a more modern way inheriting many cool and clean iOS attributes.
2010-12-06 06:01 PM
Achille wrote:No shortage of those in Windows either. Revit has loads of fixed size, modal dialogs (this may be improved with 2011 - I don't recall).
and may I add, that there are some windows, that can't be resized at all!!!
2010-12-13 11:27 AM
Matthew wrote:It didn't been improved in Revit 2011.Achille wrote:No shortage of those in Windows either. Revit has loads of fixed size, modal dialogs (this may be improved with 2011 - I don't recall).
and may I add, that there are some windows, that can't be resized at all!!!
2011-08-11 01:43 PM
Ralph wrote:you echo the thousands of AutoCAD and Revit users from 3-4 years ago.
The ribbon conceptisan abomination - one that I hope we never see in ArchiCAD. It's like Kid Pix without the fun. I can barely tolerate products like MS Office that have embraced it - the loss in productivity is frightening.
2011-08-11 08:05 PM
2011-08-17 02:13 PM
a key drawback is you have to relearn where the icons are -- one problem is that Archicad's icons are so divorced from the graphic/CAD/BIM design industry standard that they would need a major overhaul of them, and redesigning them for the multiple sizes required by the ribbon is the ideal opportunity to do thatAlthough there is a lot to improve with AC UI I would say thanks God that AC icons are divorced from CAD/BIM design industry, actually what is the standard? Adesk products or Microstation? Allplan or Vectorworks? The fact is that the ribbon interface was crafted for completely different type of applications and purpose yet Adesk managed to hammer it in... it feels like square peg in a round hole. I should congratulate them for the effort however the result is still square peg in a round hole and it should be shown as a perfect example of mismatched purpose vs functionality.