2006-03-23 05:39 PM
2006-03-23 05:54 PM
2006-03-24 03:30 PM
2006-03-25 04:42 AM
laszlonagy wrote:Therefore, if the backwards compatibility is important, use only the oldest version's library. Make SURE that, in case of 9/8.1, you use the 8.1 library revised for 9!!! Free download from tech support sites.
This is very visible mostly in case of Library Parts.
If you save a version 9 file in version 8 format, Library Parts will not be converted, since they are a later format.
SO this info will be either lost, or in AC 9 you can explode all Library Parts (create 2D lines/fiils/texts with 3D lost) and that will be saved into ArchiCAD 8.
2006-03-25 04:44 AM
boofredlay wrote:no! the other way around . . . newer versions are generally backwards compatible but you will never open a newer file version in an older archiCAD: you must always 'save as...' the earlier file version and in the process lose any data-associated with the newer version.
I "hear" that ArchiCAD allows you to open say a version 9 file in version 8 for example. Is this the case? Are there limitations or problems with this?
2006-03-29 02:25 AM
~/archiben wrote:Off-Topic:
because of the advanced data-structures needed to contain the building information - and the continually developing nature of that information - there can sometimes be a few issues with this process too. as lászló has pointed out, this is usually only the case with objects/library parts as their data structures change the most radically with each release.
~/archiben
2006-03-29 02:59 AM
laszlonagy wrote:vertesi, neda, kocsis, vass, papp . . . and your good-self nagy makes six budapest lászló's that i have communicated with over the last few years . . . but it's probably the only name i do get right!
Ben, completely correctly written Hungarian name, I'm impressed
2006-03-29 06:56 AM
2006-05-15 02:39 PM