2019-08-02 08:10 PM
Solved! Go to Solution.
2019-08-11 09:19 PM
Macbook Pro M1 Max 64GB ram, OS X 10.XX latest
another Moderator
2019-08-12 09:47 PM
2019-10-23 03:59 AM
2019-11-08 02:56 PM
2019-12-13 06:19 AM
Architect | Graphisoft Certified BIM Manager
ArchiCAD 27 JPN USA & INT | Windows 10
2021-10-17 06:02 PM
Hi László,
I know this thread is old, but actually that is kind of a problem, right?
Adding properties to BMat does nothing good. In fact it was quite a dumb move.
Surfaces should have properties and Composites and Custom Profiles.
Now stick with Surfaces:
Every single project needs a finishes schedule.
Nobody will create a new bmat for every different paint and tile and carpet etc. We use surfaces for that. Often we even apply images to those surfaces that represent a selected product.
Now that's what we need to be able to schedule:
The Code of the finish (surface) , the name, the size, the supplier, manufacturer and yeah with god's help, where they are used, like: door frames, ceiling paint, balcony balustrade etc...
2021-10-18 06:51 AM
Yes, I agree. More attribute types need to have their own Properties, not only Building Materials.