2006-08-10 11:22 AM - last edited on 2024-07-09 02:01 PM by Aruzhan Ilaikova
2006-09-04 11:34 AM
2006-09-05 09:10 AM
2006-09-12 09:05 PM
2006-09-13 02:06 AM
2006-09-13 11:17 AM
2006-09-13 06:31 PM
2006-09-14 07:21 AM
Djordje wrote:Wouldnt it be smart if individuals & companies developing add-ons chose names that did not mimic Graphisoft ones? Or at least qualified them so they were identifiable as by another company e.g. 'profilerCI'.
It ran well for me with all the plugins in place - Graphisoft ones, mind you. No CADImage.
2006-09-14 05:00 PM
Erika wrote:It seems like that would be a no brainer. Cadimage is supposedly in the process of changing the name of their product. I am surprised it wasn't named 3D profiler instead of just profiler...
Wouldnt it be smart if individuals & companies developing add-ons chose names that did not mimic Graphisoft ones? Or at least qualified them so they were identifiable as by another company e.g. 'profilerCI'.
Ditto library parts.
2006-09-15 12:14 AM
Mike wrote:they have. the newsflash is here: http://www.cadimagetools.com/
Cadimage is supposedly in the process of changing the name of their product. I am surprised it wasn't named 3D profiler instead of just profiler...