RAID 0
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-03-01 03:07 AM
2019-03-01
03:07 AM
with any success ?
3 REPLIES 3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b540b/b540b4a0207776f960bf4af16fd17e5fc71e400c" alt="Lingwisyer Lingwisyer"
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-03-01 05:47 AM
2019-03-01
05:47 AM
Someone did a review of it over on eteknix a while back. Basically says that you will get a decent improvement in your read and write performance but at the cost of increased latency. Also, the rest of your system might bottleneck the performance in which case you will get the latency without the performance...
https://www.eteknix.com/year-nvme-raid-0-real-world-setup/
Ling.
Ling.
AC22-28 AUS 3110 | Help Those Help You - Add a Signature |
Self-taught, bend it till it breaks | Creating a Thread |
Win11 | i9 10850K | 64GB | RX6600 | Win11 | R5 2600 | 16GB | GTX1660 |
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-03-01 11:05 AM
2019-03-01
11:05 AM
Why not use a ramdisk??
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-03-01 11:21 AM
2019-03-01
11:21 AM
Risky setup for marginal real world performance gains, I don’t think you’d get any noticeable performance gain in ARCHICAD and possibly a decrease in performance due to latency and RAID overhead.
I’d only look at RAID 10 for anything with project data, no redundancy in RAID 0, but I don’t know of any motherboards with 4No M.2 slots required for this.
Scott
I’d only look at RAID 10 for anything with project data, no redundancy in RAID 0, but I don’t know of any motherboards with 4No M.2 slots required for this.
Scott