2014-03-02 10:42 PM
2014-03-04 03:09 PM
PROJECT2{3} projection_code, angle, method, parts [, backgroundColor, fillOrigoX, fillOrigoY, filldirection][[,] PARAMETERS name1=value1, ..., namen=valuen]So to achieve this particular result you need to provide not only the first 4 parameters, but at least the next 4 parameters as well. Those define the cut fill's background color and the origin and direction of its pattern.
PROJECT2{3} 2,270,2+16+4092,15, 19, 0, 0, 0I suppose would set the background fill color to Pen 19 (usually white), the Fill's origin will be at 0, 0 in the X-Y plane of the Object, and its direction will be the direction of the X axis.
2014-03-05 12:17 AM
2014-03-05 02:29 PM
Richardng wrote:It just depends on the object and the desired plan view, the vast majority of objects I have created do not have a cut plane, mostly a simplified top down view.
Am I missing something obvious - doesn't everybody want their objects to simply be cut with the floor plan?
Richardng wrote:Except for very complicated shapes where an accurate top down view is needed, a 2D Script is better: it runs faster without the overhead of creating a 3D view for each object's representation in plan view. A lot of objects using Project2 will take unnecessary resources for plan generation. Some of the code used for the 3D object can be reused for the 2D Script, with a change in command and editing some of the variables.
(and not waste time writing a duplicate script in 2D that has to be updated with any changes to the 3D shape)
2014-03-06 06:27 PM
2014-03-06 09:55 PM
2014-03-06 10:22 PM
2014-03-06 10:54 PM
2014-03-09 10:14 PM