jl_lt wrote:
Absolutely great Project Mr. Knutsson, congratulations to you and your team. Complex yet grounded architecture.
would it be asking too much if youd discuss the complications, limitations and/or advantages you found out modelling a project like this in Archicad?
Thank you
Well basically many chefs in the soup...ranging from left brainers to right brainers however for which Archicad is the best tool. Of course we had challenges between visual 3D and 2D documentation. 3D is always more or less easy regarding how much BIM we put into the model. This is not so much a BIM-project other than regular quantities of interior stuff and some more. It's a large project and quite often slow to work with which is why the team would't like to present it live.
No fancy stuff, just straight Archicad. I could have modeled this with Archicad when I first learned it 20 years ago. It's easier today though, especially with the morph tool. This building doesn't have any double curvatures, loft surfaces or such so the only thing custom is a gdl-object for the exterior red flanges (a penta prism with editable hotspots. Flanges could easily be done with Grasshopper but the architect is not a Rhino/GH user so the flowing "elbow" on the flanges was done manually by adjusting each flange hotspot after splines or polyline curves. It's pretty quick and the architect can do the job without having call a software expert (which is kind of the beacon for our way of working with Archicad...).
AC 25 SWE Full
HP Zbook Fury 15,6 G8. 32 GB RAM. Nvidia RTX A3000.