2006-08-30 07:02 PM
2006-10-02 12:42 PM
"gkmethy" wrote:http://www.graphisoft.com/company/press_zone/mactel100.html
Here you can find our benchmark results. The data is an average of many files, each measured multiple times, so these are very reliable data. We have not tested Mac Mini and MacBook, because their hardware specs do not meet the Archicad requirements.
2006-10-02 04:18 PM
March, wrote:Remember that Archicad is not multi-threaded. The extra processors only matter in LIghtworks, not in generating elevations, schedules, etc.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but are we comparing a quad to twin computers here & we're surprised the quad is twice as fast? .
2006-10-03 03:50 AM
2006-10-03 08:06 AM
Adalbert wrote:If you think the MBP17 is big try bench pressing a 17" HP or Dell.
Con - it is a big sucker but the screen has only the same height as the old G4 titanium. The 15 is a joke
2006-10-03 11:18 PM
2006-10-03 11:26 PM
Adalbert wrote:oh yeah!
I take back the con
The 17 MBP is FANTASTIC
2006-10-04 05:07 AM
2006-10-04 11:44 PM
Adalbert wrote:what if you turn off 'bridged networking' (where the PC effectively piggybacks the mac's existing network signal) and assign the virtual machine its own network settings? i've not tried it - i don't need to - but that seems to be the logical place to start . . .
From the server I could not see the virtual WIN (parallel)
2006-10-12 03:49 AM
2006-10-12 07:07 AM
Adalbert wrote:This is disappointing if true. I've been thinking of getting a new 23" or 30" to use with my MBP. I guess I should test it at the Apple store first.
After connecting my old cinema display the MacBook Pro turned much slower and the mouse is jumpy as with a remote desktop.
I reconsider my old G5 is better with a large screen.