ArchiCAD 11

[Anonymous]

ArchiCAD 11 will come soon (as much as I suspect..)
What can AC 11 do better than AC10?

[Jefferson]

Good one Richard! Pretty endless possibilities really, one would hope anyway, and something random would make it OH SO exciting to open a project ...............or the operators last project, or a monthly contest winner, or some graphic logo, [a GOOD ONE!]..........or maybe we should just stick to getting what we've got working as intended. What a concept

[Anonymous]

Not a random building generator only a single building generator.
Im so happy ! All is done when i start the program - The future of BIM

[Steve Jepson]

.

[Steve Jepson]

.

[Jefferson]

No, no Steve. It's just the new random building generator has locked up. tech is working on it.........

[Rakela Raul]

i would really want that fence selection (inside or outside) to be switched
with hit of a button or at least the autocad way (rt or lt drag)

[Stress Co_]

Jefferson wrote:
Good one Richard! Pretty endless possibilities really, one would hope anyway, and something random would make it OH SO exciting to open a project ...............or the operators last project, or a monthly contest winner, or some graphic logo, [a GOOD ONE!]..........or maybe we should just stick to getting what we've got working as intended. What a concept

I'd prefer it to just load really, really fast ..... so fast that there would be no time to see any graphic.

[March_ Bruce]

I might suggest from a user rather than a cashflow basis that longer upgrade cycles are preferable as bugs in existing versions are never fixed before we are asked to pony up, interrupt workflows & learn new features.

Running a practice offers quite a different perspective than merely being a cad monkey - cad is simply one small component of a much bigger sphere of concern.

Statute of limitations on liability is one example which also ties into reuse of past project data & details, which basically means I must keep access to projects for 15 years ie projects that were started in 1991. This is one area that is staring to become a burden given that at best we can look back to v6.5 projects currently from a library part standpoint.

I would also prefer to see GS pursue revenues by broadening the user base & getting v10 working flawlessly on all 'supported' platforms (intel mac still has major bugs), with templates & all the discontinued library parts (a dining room table would be nice) that will maximize legacy project access, rather than trying to generate revenue by fragementing the user base with increasing upgrade frequency...

[Rakela Raul]

that longer upgrade cycles are preferable

im thinking about the same, BUT, could it be that ac10 had a huge interface makeup and we are still 'getting to know' the interface ?? and we want to rest a little bit ?

[Laura Yanoviak]

March, wrote:
I would also prefer to see GS pursue revenues by broadening the user base & getting v10 working flawlessly...

Amen.