Check Markers Palette

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-02-29 07:08 PM
2008-02-29
07:08 PM
First of all, if a Viewpoint has been deleted, there is no Marker.
Secondly, if a Marker is not associated with a Viewpoint, then it references a Drawing (be it "The selected drawing" or "The first placed drawing of..."). So, if a Marker is indeed "defined", it still shows up in the list if it is not associated with a
So, as I understand it, the palette checks to see if Markers are referencing placed Drawings -- "Viewpoints" and "Views" are irrelevant.
MacBook Pro Apple M2 Max, 96 GB of RAM
AC27 US (5003) on Mac OS Ventura 13.6.2
Started on AC4.0 in 91/92/93; full-time user since AC8.1 in 2004
AC27 US (5003) on Mac OS Ventura 13.6.2
Started on AC4.0 in 91/92/93; full-time user since AC8.1 in 2004
3 REPLIES 3
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-03-02 03:08 AM
2008-03-02
03:08 AM
Laura wrote:not really - a marker can exist independently to viewpoints, views or drawings: it's "undefined".
First of all, if a Viewpoint has been deleted, there is no Marker.
the check marker palette helps find all of those undefined markers so that you can either delete them or link them to something . . .
it doesn't help that the whole marker system is a confusing mess to begin with.
b
b e n f r o s t
b f [a t ] p l a n b a r c h i t e c t u r e [d o t] n z
archicad | sketchup! | coffeecup
b f [a t ] p l a n b a r c h i t e c t u r e [d o t] n z
archicad | sketchup! | coffeecup

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-03-03 06:21 AM
2008-03-03
06:21 AM
Laura wrote:Yes - I use it to check my templates as they near completion.
Has anyone used this new function much?
Laura wrote:True, but as Ben said, a marker can exist without a viewpoint. You may be being too literal here...
First of all, if a Viewpoint has been deleted, there is no Marker.
Laura wrote:That is also true, but a marker can be linked to the view or the viewpoint that the drawing is derived from, not directly to the drawing itself.
Secondly, if a Marker is not associated with a Viewpoint, then it references a Drawing (be it "The selected drawing" or "The first placed drawing of..."). So, if a Marker is indeed "defined", it still shows up in the list if it is not associated with aplaced Drawing.
So, as I understand it, the palette checks to see if Markers are referencing placed Drawings -- "Viewpoints" and "Views" are irrelevant.
For example let's say you have 'A Section' as a viewpoint and you make a view from it called 'SECTION AA'. Then you place this section view in your schematic subset
Next try this. Drag a new
These two methods are what I believe GS is referring to in the reference manual as "automatically or manually linked ". So as obscure as GS have made it, viewpoints and views are actually relevant in this process.
In any case, I typically link the marker directly to the selected drawing and bypass all that other nonsense. Hope that helps clear it up a little.
Cheers,
Link.

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2008-03-03 06:25 PM
2008-03-03
06:25 PM
Thanks for the responses, guys. My main point of frustration is the wording of the Reference Manual, and trying to decipher what it's trying to say. I've used Source/Linked/Unlinked Markers for the past 8 months with success, but I'm confused by the Check Markers function.
In my investigations, if a Viewpoint is deleted, the Source Marker and all associated Linked Markers are deleted.
I also find it odd that, even if the Marker is valid (i.e., it's referencing an existing Viewpoint or View), it shows up on "the list" if a Drawing hasn't been placed -- or maybe that's a part of the functionality?
Anyway, I tell my users to assign Source Markers to "The viewpoint" (initially, anyway), and Linked Markers to "The selected drawing".
In my investigations, if a Viewpoint is deleted, the Source Marker and all associated Linked Markers are deleted.
I also find it odd that, even if the Marker is valid (i.e., it's referencing an existing Viewpoint or View), it shows up on "the list" if a Drawing hasn't been placed -- or maybe that's a part of the functionality?
Anyway, I tell my users to assign Source Markers to "The viewpoint" (initially, anyway), and Linked Markers to "The selected drawing".
MacBook Pro Apple M2 Max, 96 GB of RAM
AC27 US (5003) on Mac OS Ventura 13.6.2
Started on AC4.0 in 91/92/93; full-time user since AC8.1 in 2004
AC27 US (5003) on Mac OS Ventura 13.6.2
Started on AC4.0 in 91/92/93; full-time user since AC8.1 in 2004