Modeling
About Archicad's design tools, element connections, modeling concepts, etc.

Layer Management in Large projects with multiple HLMs:

Anonymous
Not applicable
Hi All

I have a large project setup with a Master Teamwork file with 10 hotlinked teamwork files(with nested modules) linked into the Master model. Working in AC17.5019 INT.

I have a query regarding management of layers and layer combinations - this project is still fairly early in the planning phase and we're already experiencing difficulties with layer duplication.

I anticipated that attribute management would be an issue on the project so I've been exporting layers (and other attributes) to .aat files and subsequently importing them into the other files and Overwriting all in order to maintain a tidy and consistent layer list. Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be working - as far as I understand things, ArchiCAD only recognises the Layer number, but I've got multiple layers on the same number and despite having replaced all layers in all of the files yesterday, when updating the HLMs, further duplication of layers occurs - see screen shot.

To further complicate things the HLMs have nested modules, which makes for rather difficult management! They all have the same original source - i.e they were all saved from a single file, but have since been edited and new layers and other attributes added.

Is there an easier method of layer management in large projects? Any tips would be most helpful!

Also, I believe this is something that GS needs to address - ArchiCAD needs a single Attribute management dialogue that can incorporate multiple files - .pln, .mod and Teamwork files in order to deal with this kind of scenario. I'm fairly sure I'm not the only person wanting this!

thanks...

Screen Shot 2014-03-25 at 09.57.05.png
1 REPLY 1
Link
Graphisoft Partner
Graphisoft Partner
The best practice I found was to eliminate any attribute holes in the template file and create all other files from that.

So your layer IDs start from 1 and continue from there, with no gaps whatsoever. The same should really apply to all attributes, which is much easier said than done, trust me.

This eases the problems, but doesn't eliminate them. At least your base layers are set and only additional or merged layers will need special consideration.

Cheers,
Link.