2005-01-10 01:36 AM - last edited on 2023-05-23 03:38 PM by Rubia Torres
2005-01-10 03:37 AM
2005-01-10 03:42 AM
Peter wrote:Peter, I meant a mesh that is just a skin. ie no shirt or thickness. Though the mesh is varied and is elevated. Sorry for the confusion.
James,
What is a mesh with "no depth"?
Do you mean a mesh with zero skirt,
a hollow mesh,
a mesh with a "Y" dimension of zero,
a mesh with all points having zero height,
or something else?
Thanks,
Peter Devlin
2005-01-10 03:48 AM
James wrote:I do wish that the mesh tool had the option to make a top surface with a uniform thickness. I think it is already on the wish list, isn't it?
I meant a mesh that is just a skin. ie no shirt or thickness. Though the mesh is varied and is elevated. Sorry for the confusion.
2005-01-10 03:53 AM
Matthew wrote:Hey Matthew. Totally agree. The skin mesh has too many problems in AC (like Solid Element Operations etc).James wrote:I do wish that the mesh tool had the option to make a top surface with a uniform thickness. I think it is already on the wish list, isn't it?
I meant a mesh that is just a skin. ie no shirt or thickness. Though the mesh is varied and is elevated. Sorry for the confusion.
2005-01-10 04:04 AM
2005-01-10 04:06 AM
James wrote:I just checked. It is fixed in AC9. (I rarely use zero depth sections so I had never tried it before.)Matthew wrote:Hey Matthew. Totally agree. The skin mesh has too many problems in AC (like Solid Element Operations etc).James wrote:I do wish that the mesh tool had the option to make a top surface with a uniform thickness. I think it is already on the wish list, isn't it?
I meant a mesh that is just a skin. ie no shirt or thickness. Though the mesh is varied and is elevated. Sorry for the confusion.
So does a mesh with no skirt not appear in a zero depth section? This seems really weird. Has this been fixed in AC9 or is it just me?
2005-01-10 04:55 AM
2005-01-10 05:37 AM
2005-01-10 05:47 AM