2007-07-18 07:08 PM - last edited on 2023-05-26 12:34 PM by Rubia Torres
2007-07-19 05:45 AM
TomWaltz wrote:Not as convenient (but may be the better choice). The other options are Revit Structure and Tekla.
Why not use the objects?
Remember that sloping beams and columns distort the shape so they are no longer accurate...Forgot about that. May not be a problem. Not sure yet if there are sloping beams or columns in the projects.
2007-07-19 07:13 AM
Matthew wrote:matthew
Not as convenient (but may be the better choice). The other options are Revit Structure and Tekla.
2007-07-19 07:17 AM
~/archiben wrote:Cool. Thanks Ben. I'll check it out. I knew I heard something about the round trip to Tekla. This could be VERY good.Matthew wrote:matthew
Not as convenient (but may be the better choice). The other options are Revit Structure and Tekla.
i'm not sure if they've updated it recently, but there is an 'x-steel' library on GS's 'structure' pages. using those steel objects rather than the AC library steel means you can round-trip with tekla . . . and supposedly be able to bring connection plates back into AC once the engineers have run their analysis and exported . . . ?
ben
2007-07-19 07:19 AM