2009-08-06 05:38 PM
2009-09-02 12:10 AM
2009-09-02 01:09 AM
Bricklyne wrote:Without going back to dig up that post i'm pretty sure i was saying that as a 'big office/project' user ... and if they had bothered to notice one running OS X
You know you're in for kind of a sorry update when the'taglines'they are using on the product page, (and lifted from right out of these very talkback, forums, no less - sorry Owen) to promote the new release, read like:
........ wrote:
“I think this [64-bit] + TW2 would make AC13 a fantastic upgrade, regardless of any other new features.”
2009-09-02 01:49 AM
owen wrote:
Disclaimer: The 64Bit+Mac fiasco has my temper, well a little high. Please excuse the f-bomb dropped below
Bricklyne wrote:Without going back to dig up that post i'm pretty sure i was saying that as a 'big office/project' user ... and if they had bothered to notice one running OS X
You know you're in for kind of a sorry update when the'taglines'they are using on the product page, (and lifted from right out of these very talkback, forums, no less - sorry Owen) to promote the new release, read like:
........ wrote:
“I think this [64-bit] + TW2 would make AC13 a fantastic upgrade, regardless of any other new features.”
................
something along the lines of ..
We (OS X users) have paid the same amount as Windows users, yet we get an inferior product. Where the f*** is the OS X 64Bit version, or do you plan on giving us a refund???
I really do not give a <b>[censored]</b> about GS dev resourcing issues .. no 64Bit Mac version is just pathetic. This has been coming for years on both platforms. Other Mac developers have managed to get on the boat, so what the f*** have you been doing?
...... wrote:
.....I feel for you small subscription users - I really do.
2009-09-02 01:50 AM
2009-09-02 02:14 AM
2009-09-02 02:26 AM
2009-09-02 04:54 AM
Bricklyne wrote:No, not accurate. You might find that beta testers
a) Beta-Testers, kinda contractually obligated to claim its a great release even when it may not seem so to the neutral observer.
2009-09-02 05:12 AM
Rick wrote:Ditto. Totally false, Clarence. The only contractual obligation of beta testers, and others who saw 13 early because of a non-disclosure, is to keep all information in confidence until Graphisoft announces the product. At that point, they / we can talk freely about anything covered in the announcement, but nothing further. Once the product ships, we can talk about any aspect of it, in any negative or positive way as we perceive it.Bricklyne wrote:No, not accurate. You might find that beta testers
a) Beta-Testers, kinda contractually obligated to claim its a great release even when it may not seem so to the neutral observer.mighthave a more realistic perception of the real world issues involved, which can effect some comments.. (due to hearing some GS comments).
2009-09-02 06:27 AM
Karl wrote:not me.
I can seeresellersonly saying glowing things, of course, but who believes them anyway? 😉
2009-09-02 06:49 AM